PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L
PAXG.L (Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS) and ESPS.L (Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds tracking the MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, from Amundi and Invesco respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAXG.L returned 1.86%/yr vs 6.05%/yr for ESPS.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAXG.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ESPS.L.
Performance
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAXG.L achieves a 8.84% return, which is significantly higher than ESPS.L's 6.57% return.
PAXG.L
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 8.84%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 6.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ESPS.L
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 6.57%
- 6M
- 7.12%
- 1Y
- 14.60%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- —
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 8.84% | 8.63% | 1.48% | -3.00% | -0.45% | 2.00% |
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 6.57% | 10.52% | 7.35% | 2.26% | 1.34% | 5.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAXG.L and ESPS.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2021 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, PAXG.L and ESPS.L have become more correlated (0.95) than their long-term average of 0.54, meaning their price movements have been converging.
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Basic Materials
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Industrials
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Real Estate
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Cyclical
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Healthcare
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Utilities
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Consumer Defensive
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Energy
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Communication Services
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Technology
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L — Risk / Return Rank
PAXG.L
ESPS.L
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAXG.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 1.93 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 5.53 | -0.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAXG.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | 1.34 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.59 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.66 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAXG.L drawdown since its inception was -31.27%, which is greater than ESPS.L's maximum drawdown of -17.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXG.L and ESPS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAXG.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.27% | -17.76% | -13.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.45% | -7.52% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.29% | -17.76% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.29% | -17.76% | -3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -4.04% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -4.55% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 2.63% | +0.34% |
Volatility
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS (PAXG.L) and Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc (ESPS.L) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAXG.L | ESPS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 3.56% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 8.36% | +0.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 10.84% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 18.86% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.15% | 18.86% | +4.29% |
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAXG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ESPS.L's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PAXG.L vs. ESPS.L - Dividend Comparison
PAXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while ESPS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESPS.L Invesco MSCI Pacific Ex Japan ESG Universal Screened UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAXG.L Lyxor MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PAXG.L and ESPS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, PAXG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAXG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for ESPS.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for PAXG.L and 0.19% for ESPS.L.
Find the right allocation for PAXG.L and ESPS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer