PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAXDX vs. PAXBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAXDX
Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
5.11%18.37%-1.55%9.33%-13.45%14.24%14.25%25.88%-4.25%19.24%
PAXBX
PAX CORE BOND FUND
-0.41%6.45%1.04%4.60%-13.60%-1.85%6.92%8.01%-0.24%2.57%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXDX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than PAXBX's -0.41% return.


PAXDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.11%
6M
4.66%
1Y
15.24%
3Y*
8.60%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*

PAXBX

1D
0.23%
1M
-1.67%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
0.29%
1Y
3.28%
3Y*
2.84%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXBX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAXDX vs. PAXBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAXDX
PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

PAXBX
PAXBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PAXBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAXBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAXBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
PAXBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAXBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAXDXPAXBXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.40

0.81

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

1.17

+0.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.14

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

1.47

+0.50

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.54

4.27

+5.27

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is higher than the PAXBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXDX and PAXBX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAXDXPAXBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40

0.81

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

-0.07

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.28

+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between PAXDX and PAXBX is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Dividend Comparison

PAXDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than PAXBX's 3.48% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
PAXDX
Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund
2.06%2.17%2.07%2.43%2.48%58.94%2.88%4.69%3.55%2.13%0.12%
PAXBX
PAX CORE BOND FUND
3.48%3.72%3.22%2.18%1.69%1.51%4.14%2.59%2.37%2.24%0.07%

Drawdowns

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXDX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, which is greater than PAXBX's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXDX and PAXBX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PAXDXPAXBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.58%

-18.88%

-14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.05%

-2.77%

-5.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.04%

-18.30%

-6.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-5.35%

+4.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-5.73%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

0.95%

+0.71%

Volatility

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) is 0.00%, while PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) has a volatility of 1.54%. This indicates that PAXDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAXBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PAXDXPAXBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

1.54%

-1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.36%

2.49%

+2.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.78%

4.38%

+7.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.30%

5.71%

+7.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.64%

4.83%

+11.81%