PAXDX vs. PAXBX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

PAXDX (Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund) and PAXBX (PAX CORE BOND FUND) are both mutual funds - PAXDX is a Infrastructure Equities fund managed by Pax World, while PAXBX is a Intermediate Core Bond fund managed by Pax World. Over the past 5 years, PAXDX returned 3.44%/yr vs -1.02%/yr for PAXBX. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PAXDX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for PAXBX.

Performance

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAXDX achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly higher than PAXBX's -1.04% return.

PAXDX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.11%
• 1Y: 7.68%
• 3Y*: 7.25%
• 5Y*: 3.44%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.31%

PAXBX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -1.48%
• 6M: -1.13%
• YTD: -1.04%
• 1Y: 1.28%
• 3Y*: 3.23%
• 5Y*: -1.02%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	5.11%	18.37%	-1.55%	9.33%	-13.45%	14.24%	14.25%	25.88%	-4.25%	19.24%
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND	-1.04%	6.45%	1.04%	4.60%	-13.60%	-1.85%	6.92%	8.01%	-0.24%	2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PAXDX and PAXBX is 0.16, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.16
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2016	0.08

The correlation between PAXDX and PAXBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.37 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAXDX vs. PAXBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAXDX

PAXDX Risk / Return Rank: 41
PAXDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PAXDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PAXDX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PAXDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
PAXDX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

PAXBX

PAXBX Risk / Return Rank: 12
PAXBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
PAXBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PAXBX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
PAXBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
PAXBX Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) and PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAXDX	PAXBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.22	0.56	+0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	0.83	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.10	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.77	0.71	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.89	1.76	+4.13

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAXDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the PAXBX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAXDX and PAXBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAXDX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, which is greater than PAXBX's maximum drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAXDX and PAXBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAXDX	PAXBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.58%	-18.88%	-14.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.49%	-2.94%	-1.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.56%	-5.18%	-9.38%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.04%	-18.15%	-6.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-5.96%	+5.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.21%	-5.71%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	1.19%	+0.28%

Volatility

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund (PAXDX) is 0.00%, while PAX CORE BOND FUND (PAXBX) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that PAXDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAXBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAXDX	PAXBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	1.02%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.19%	2.94%	+0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.12%	3.74%	+3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.10%	5.75%	+7.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.41%	4.80%	+11.61%

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAXDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than PAXBX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAXDX vs. PAXBX - Dividend Comparison

PAXDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, less than PAXBX's 3.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
PAXBX PAX CORE BOND FUND	3.65%	3.72%	3.22%	2.18%	1.69%	1.51%	4.14%	2.59%	2.37%	2.24%	0.07%
PAXDX Pax Global Sustainable Infrastructure Fund	1.06%	2.17%	2.07%	2.43%	2.48%	58.94%	2.88%	4.69%	3.55%	2.13%	0.12%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAXDX and PAXBX in my portfolio?

PAXDX and PAXBX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAXDX or PAXBX?

PAXBX has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to PAXDX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAXDX dropped -33.58% vs PAXBX's -18.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAXDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.