PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAWZ vs. WLDR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAWZ vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAWZ vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PAWZ
ProShares Pet Care ETF
-6.00%1.21%3.88%12.47%-40.08%10.46%61.69%22.95%-9.71%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
4.74%31.24%22.74%18.93%-10.44%26.77%-1.93%21.54%-11.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a -6.00% return, which is significantly lower than WLDR's 4.74% return.


PAWZ

1D
2.27%
1M
-10.53%
YTD
-6.00%
6M
-8.19%
1Y
-1.00%
3Y*
1.77%
5Y*
-6.17%
10Y*

WLDR

1D
3.02%
1M
-5.50%
YTD
4.74%
6M
8.72%
1Y
40.45%
3Y*
24.21%
5Y*
15.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAWZ vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAWZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAWZ vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAWZ
PAWZ Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
PAWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PAWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

WLDR
WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAWZ vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAWZWLDRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.05

2.15

-2.20

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.05

2.81

-2.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.43

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

3.04

-3.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.12

14.50

-14.62

PAWZ vs. WLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAWZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the WLDR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAWZ and WLDR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAWZWLDRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

2.15

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.31

0.89

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.47

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between PAWZ and WLDR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

PAWZ vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison

PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than WLDR's 8.72% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PAWZ
ProShares Pet Care ETF
0.81%0.81%0.63%0.44%0.54%0.18%0.14%0.35%0.07%
WLDR
Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF
8.72%9.01%13.99%2.28%2.10%7.55%1.80%2.48%2.82%

Drawdowns

PAWZ vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, which is greater than WLDR's maximum drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and WLDR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PAWZWLDRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.07%

-44.69%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.80%

-13.31%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.07%

-23.77%

-26.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-37.47%

-6.11%

-31.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.18%

-8.79%

-13.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.52%

2.79%

+3.73%

Volatility

PAWZ vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is 5.42%, while Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that PAWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PAWZWLDRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.42%

6.81%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.51%

11.45%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.36%

18.94%

-0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.07%

17.06%

+3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

20.99%

+0.74%