PAWZ vs. DBO
PAWZ (ProShares Pet Care ETF) and DBO (Invesco DB Oil Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PAWZ is a Global Equities fund tracking the FactSet Pet Care Index, while DBO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAWZ returned -8.90%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for DBO. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAWZ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBO.
Performance
PAWZ vs. DBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAWZ achieves a -13.24% return, which is significantly lower than DBO's 79.84% return.
PAWZ
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -13.24%
- 6M
- -13.41%
- 1Y
- -20.17%
- 3Y*
- -1.03%
- 5Y*
- -8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
DBO
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -3.39%
- YTD
- 79.84%
- 6M
- 74.51%
- 1Y
- 77.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.89%
PAWZ vs. DBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | -13.24% | 1.21% | 3.88% | 12.47% | -40.08% | 10.46% | 61.69% | 22.95% | -9.71% |
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 79.84% | -11.71% | 7.85% | -4.44% | 13.04% | 60.74% | -20.99% | 28.05% | -25.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAWZ and DBO is -0.31, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2018 | 0.09 |
The correlation between PAWZ and DBO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PAWZ vs. DBO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PAWZ
DBO
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
PAWZ
DBO
-
Consumer Defensive
PAWZ
DBO
-
Consumer Cyclical
PAWZ
DBO
-
Basic Materials
PAWZ
DBO
-
Technology
PAWZ
DBO
-
Financial Services
PAWZ
DBO
Communication Services
PAWZ
-
DBO
-
Energy
PAWZ
-
DBO
-
Industrials
PAWZ
-
DBO
-
Real Estate
PAWZ
-
DBO
-
Utilities
PAWZ
-
DBO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAWZ vs. DBO — Risk / Return Rank
PAWZ
DBO
PAWZ vs. DBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) and Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAWZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.36 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 4.28 | -5.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.18 | 8.69 | -10.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAWZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.22 | 2.25 | -3.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.44 | 0.48 | -0.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.02 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
PAWZ vs. DBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAWZ drawdown since its inception was -50.07%, smaller than the maximum DBO drawdown of -90.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWZ and DBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAWZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.07% | -90.18% | +40.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -18.19% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.12% | -28.20% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -37.68% | -12.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.28% | -52.68% | +10.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.57% | -62.25% | +39.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.39% | 8.94% | +0.45% |
Volatility
PAWZ vs. DBO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Pet Care ETF (PAWZ) is 5.99%, while Invesco DB Oil Fund (DBO) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that PAWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAWZ | DBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 12.79% | -6.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.33% | 28.32% | -16.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.65% | 34.58% | -17.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.18% | 32.31% | -12.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.68% | 31.79% | -10.11% |
PAWZ vs. DBO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAWZ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAWZ vs. DBO - Dividend Comparison
PAWZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.88%, less than DBO's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBO Invesco DB Oil Fund | 1.95% | 3.51% | 4.68% | 4.59% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.63% | 1.58% |
PAWZ ProShares Pet Care ETF | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.63% | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.35% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAWZ and DBO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBO has higher volatility (12.79%) compared to PAWZ (5.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAWZ dropped -50.07% vs DBO's -90.18%.
On 5-year performance, DBO leads with 15.36% vs -8.90% for PAWZ. On fees, PAWZ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PAWZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBO has performed better with a 15.36% return vs -8.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAWZ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBO.
DBO has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.88% for PAWZ.
PAWZ is categorized as Global Equities, while DBO is Oil & Gas. PAWZ tracks FactSet Pet Care Index, while DBO tracks DBIQ Optimum Yield Crude Oil Index Excess Return. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PAWZ and 0.78% for DBO.
DBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs -1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAWZ and DBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer