PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI World ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAWS.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PAWS.L is traded in GBp, while LGGL.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LGGL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAWS.L achieves a 5.65% return, which is significantly lower than LGGL.L's 9.21% return.


PAWS.L

1D
0.02%
1M
0.91%
YTD
5.65%
6M
6.18%
1Y
14.12%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
10Y*

LGGL.L

1D
2.44%
1M
1.98%
YTD
9.21%
6M
9.67%
1Y
25.49%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
12.83%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PAWS.L
Invesco MSCI World ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc
5.65%7.39%14.93%14.95%-12.42%7,269.00%
LGGL.L
L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF
9.21%12.55%21.28%18.77%-8.29%2.47%

Correlation

The correlation between PAWS.L and LGGL.L is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2021

0.85

The correlation between PAWS.L and LGGL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAWS.L
PAWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PAWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PAWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

LGGL.L
LGGL.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGGL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI World ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAWS.L) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAWS.LLGGL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+195.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

87.34

1.39

+85.94

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

3.85

-3.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

14.07

-13.55

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAWS.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.00, which is lower than the LGGL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAWS.L and LGGL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAWS.L drawdown since its inception was -99.03%, which is greater than LGGL.L's maximum drawdown of -25.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAWS.L and LGGL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAWS.LLGGL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.03%

-25.97%

-73.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-99.02%

-6.59%

-92.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.03%

-19.24%

-79.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-1.11%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.66%

-3.29%

-4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

26.63%

1.81%

+24.82%

Volatility

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI World ESG Climate Paris Aligned UCITS ETF Acc (PAWS.L) is 3.50%, while L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (LGGL.L) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that PAWS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGGL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAWS.LLGGL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.50%

4.32%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

653.26%

9.35%

+643.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19,679.03%

11.99%

+19,667.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9,948.20%

14.50%

+9,933.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9,948.20%

16.28%

+9,931.92%

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAWS.L has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than LGGL.L's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PAWS.L vs. LGGL.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAWS.L nor LGGL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PAWS.L and LGGL.L have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGGL.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGGL.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for PAWS.L.

PAWS.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while LGGL.L tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for PAWS.L and 0.10% for LGGL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAWS.L and LGGL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer