PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAUG vs. BUFP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PAUG vs. BUFP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PAUG vs. BUFP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
-1.23%12.34%5.78%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
-1.34%12.92%6.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAUG achieves a -1.23% return, which is significantly higher than BUFP's -1.34% return.


PAUG

1D
1.71%
1M
-1.97%
YTD
-1.23%
6M
0.59%
1Y
13.08%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*

BUFP

1D
1.96%
1M
-2.04%
YTD
-1.34%
6M
1.19%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAUG vs. BUFP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BUFP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PAUG vs. BUFP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAUG
PAUG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFP
BUFP Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
BUFP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFP Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAUG vs. BUFP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) and PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAUGBUFPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

1.86

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.71

+0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.86

9.81

+1.04

PAUG vs. BUFP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the BUFP Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAUG and BUFP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAUGBUFPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.23

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

1.02

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between PAUG and BUFP is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PAUG vs. BUFP - Dividend Comparison

PAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUFP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
PAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%
BUFP
PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF
0.01%0.01%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PAUG vs. BUFP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAUG drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, which is greater than BUFP's maximum drawdown of -11.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAUG and BUFP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PAUGBUFPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-11.98%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.15%

-8.16%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.31%

-2.54%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.85%

-1.08%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.42%

-0.18%

Volatility

PAUG vs. BUFP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - August (PAUG) is 2.92%, while PGIM Laddered S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) has a volatility of 3.41%. This indicates that PAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BUFP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PAUGBUFPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

3.41%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.41%

4.99%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.14%

11.11%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.67%

9.79%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.71%

9.79%

+0.92%