PATH vs. REMX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PATH (UiPath Inc.) is a stock, while REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) is Materials fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Over the past 5 years, PATH returned -31.21%/yr vs 4.22%/yr for REMX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PATH vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UiPath Inc. (PATH) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PATH achieves a -28.80% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's 31.22% return.

PATH

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 9.07%
• YTD: -28.80%
• 6M: -36.85%
• 1Y: -10.57%
• 3Y*: -15.58%
• 5Y*: -31.21%
• 10Y*: —

REMX

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: -6.58%
• YTD: 31.22%
• 6M: 39.17%
• 1Y: 160.26%
• 3Y*: 6.64%
• 5Y*: 4.22%
• 10Y*: 9.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATH vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PATH UiPath Inc.	-28.80%	28.95%	-48.83%	95.44%	-70.53%	-37.49%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	31.22%	92.95%	-35.02%	-19.18%	-31.13%	49.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PATH and REMX is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021	0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between PATH and REMX has dropped to 0.10 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

PATH vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATH

PATH Risk / Return Rank: 35
PATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
PATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PATH Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PATH Martin Ratio Rank: 35

REMX

REMX Risk / Return Rank: 86
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATH vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PATH	REMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	3.36	-3.52
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.21	3.51	-3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.44	-0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.21	6.91	-7.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.38	19.75	-20.13
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PATH vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATH Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATH and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PATH	REMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	3.36	-3.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.49	0.11	-0.60
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.26	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.46	-0.08	-0.38

Drawdowns

PATH vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, roughly equal to the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and REMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PATH	REMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.98%	-90.20%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.37%	-23.35%	-28.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-65.10%	-62.11%	-2.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-87.66%	-73.34%	-14.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-73.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.29%	-55.58%	-30.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.73%	-66.86%	-6.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	27.92%	8.15%	+19.77%

Volatility

PATH vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a higher volatility of 19.85% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) at 12.92%. This indicates that PATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PATH	REMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.85%	12.92%	+6.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	48.46%	34.80%	+13.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	63.43%	48.11%	+15.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.65%	40.23%	+23.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	64.27%	36.93%	+27.34%

Dividends

PATH vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

PATH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PATH UiPath Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REMX VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF	1.34%	1.76%	2.56%	0.00%	1.56%	5.25%	0.81%	1.64%	12.43%	2.89%	2.23%	4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PATH and REMX in my portfolio?

PATH and REMX have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PATH or REMX?

PATH has higher volatility (19.85%) compared to REMX (12.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs REMX's -90.20%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.