PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PATH vs. RBLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PATH vs. RBLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PATH having a -33.68% return and RBLX slightly higher at -32.89%.


PATH

1D
1.78%
1M
-7.25%
YTD
-33.68%
6M
-34.79%
1Y
-15.08%
3Y*
-13.11%
5Y*
-30.57%
10Y*

RBLX

1D
0.07%
1M
15.33%
YTD
-32.89%
6M
-33.53%
1Y
-48.31%
3Y*
10.50%
5Y*
-8.72%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PATH vs. RBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PATH
UiPath Inc.
-33.68%28.95%-48.83%95.44%-70.53%-34.15%
RBLX
Roblox Corporation
-32.89%40.04%26.55%60.65%-72.41%48.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PATH and RBLX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2021

0.50

The correlation between PATH and RBLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PATH:

$5.74B

RBLX:

$38.70B

EPS

PATH:

$0.61

RBLX:

-$1.56

PS Ratio

PATH:

3.51

RBLX:

7.22

PB Ratio

PATH:

3.01

RBLX:

89.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

PATH:

$1.67B

RBLX:

$5.30B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PATH:

$1.39B

RBLX:

$4.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

PATH:

$115.98M

RBLX:

-$944.43M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PATH vs. RBLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PATH
PATH Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PATH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PATH Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

RBLX
RBLX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
RBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
RBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PATH vs. RBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Roblox Corporation (RBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PATHRBLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.88

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.29

-0.68

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

-1.10

+0.60

PATH vs. RBLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PATH Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is higher than the RBLX Sharpe Ratio of -0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PATH and RBLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PATH vs. RBLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, which is greater than RBLX's maximum drawdown of -82.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and RBLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PATHRBLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.98%

-82.79%

-6.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.37%

-70.82%

+19.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.10%

-70.82%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-86.30%

-82.79%

-3.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-87.23%

-61.59%

-25.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.85%

-53.11%

-20.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.26%

43.94%

-13.68%

Volatility

PATH vs. RBLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UiPath Inc. (PATH) is 17.74%, while Roblox Corporation (RBLX) has a volatility of 22.63%. This indicates that PATH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PATHRBLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.74%

22.63%

-4.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.96%

51.83%

-9.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.94%

62.91%

+1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.52%

69.62%

-6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.03%

70.37%

-6.34%

Dividends

PATH vs. RBLX - Dividend Comparison

Neither PATH nor RBLX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PATH vs. RBLX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UiPath Inc. and Roblox Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
418.38M
1.44B
(PATH) Total Revenue
(RBLX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PATH vs. RBLX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UiPath Inc. and Roblox Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

74.0%76.0%78.0%80.0%82.0%84.0%86.0%20222023202420252026
81.6%
79.6%
Portfolio components
PATH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.

RBLX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.15B and revenue of 1.44B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.6%.

PATH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

RBLX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Roblox Corporation reported an operating income of -294.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in an operating margin of -20.4%.

PATH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

RBLX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Roblox Corporation reported a net income of -246.00M and revenue of 1.44B, resulting in a net margin of -17.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PATH and RBLX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RBLX has higher volatility (22.63%) compared to PATH (17.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs RBLX's -82.79%.

PATH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PATH and RBLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer