PATH vs. NFLX
PATH (UiPath Inc.) and NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) are both stocks. PATH operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while NFLX operates in Entertainment (Communication Services). Over the past 5 years, PATH returned -30.46%/yr vs 11.21%/yr for NFLX. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PATH vs. NFLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PATH achieves a -31.85% return, which is significantly lower than NFLX's -11.86% return.
PATH
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- -31.85%
- 6M
- -42.09%
- 1Y
- -15.44%
- 3Y*
- -13.35%
- 5Y*
- -30.46%
- 10Y*
- —
NFLX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -11.86%
- 6M
- -14.62%
- 1Y
- -33.43%
- 3Y*
- 25.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 24.31%
PATH vs. NFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PATH UiPath Inc. | -31.85% | 28.95% | -48.83% | 95.44% | -70.53% | -37.49% |
NFLX Netflix, Inc. | -11.86% | 5.19% | 83.07% | 65.11% | -51.05% | 18.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PATH and NFLX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PATH and NFLX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.41, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PATH:
$5.90B
NFLX:
$355.22B
PATH:
$0.61
NFLX:
$3.09
PATH:
18.43
NFLX:
26.73
PATH:
3.61
NFLX:
7.62
PATH:
3.10
NFLX:
11.41
PATH:
$1.67B
NFLX:
$46.89B
PATH:
$1.39B
NFLX:
$22.99B
PATH:
$115.98M
NFLX:
$26.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PATH vs. NFLX — Risk / Return Rank
PATH
NFLX
PATH vs. NFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UiPath Inc. (PATH) and Netflix, Inc. (NFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PATH | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.82 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.30 | -0.77 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.55 | -1.36 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PATH | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | -1.01 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.48 | 0.26 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.47 | 0.58 | -1.04 |
Drawdowns
PATH vs. NFLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PATH drawdown since its inception was -88.98%, which is greater than NFLX's maximum drawdown of -81.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PATH and NFLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PATH | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -88.98% | -81.99% | -6.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.37% | -43.35% | -8.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -65.10% | -43.35% | -21.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -87.33% | -75.95% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -86.88% | -38.29% | -48.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.75% | -24.90% | -48.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.16% | 24.70% | +3.46% |
Volatility
PATH vs. NFLX - Volatility Comparison
UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a higher volatility of 19.80% compared to Netflix, Inc. (NFLX) at 6.64%. This indicates that PATH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PATH | NFLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.80% | 6.64% | +13.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.04% | 25.22% | +17.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.65% | 33.15% | +30.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.64% | 43.10% | +20.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.24% | 41.52% | +22.72% |
Dividends
PATH vs. NFLX - Dividend Comparison
Neither PATH nor NFLX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PATH vs. NFLX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UiPath Inc. and Netflix, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PATH vs. NFLX - Profitability Comparison
PATH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.
NFLX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a gross profit of 6.36B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.9%.
PATH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
NFLX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.
PATH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
NFLX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Netflix, Inc. reported a net income of 5.28B and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of 43.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PATH and NFLX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATH has higher volatility (19.80%) compared to NFLX (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PATH dropped -88.98% vs NFLX's -81.99%.
PATH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.24 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PATH and NFLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer