PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PARNX vs. NEEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PARNX vs. NEEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund (PARNX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PARNX vs. NEEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PARNX
Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund
-7.03%9.14%10.58%35.60%-33.54%9.35%28.75%29.82%-9.80%16.12%
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
15.68%8.76%14.45%26.85%-33.57%27.63%41.73%42.33%-10.56%8.33%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PARNX achieves a -7.03% return, which is significantly lower than NEEGX's 15.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PARNX has underperformed NEEGX with an annualized return of 8.27%, while NEEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.


PARNX

1D
3.72%
1M
-5.94%
YTD
-7.03%
6M
-8.10%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
1.44%
10Y*
8.27%

NEEGX

1D
4.73%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
15.68%
6M
17.81%
1Y
49.67%
3Y*
18.80%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
12.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PARNX vs. NEEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PARNX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than NEEGX's 1.78% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PARNX vs. NEEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PARNX
PARNX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PARNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PARNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PARNX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PARNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PARNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

NEEGX
NEEGX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
NEEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NEEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
NEEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
NEEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
NEEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PARNX vs. NEEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund (PARNX) and Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PARNXNEEGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.51

1.56

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.91

2.16

-1.25

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.64

3.25

-2.61

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.13

10.67

-8.54

PARNX vs. NEEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PARNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.51, which is lower than the NEEGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PARNX and NEEGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PARNXNEEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

1.56

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

0.25

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.51

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.54

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between PARNX and NEEGX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PARNX vs. NEEGX - Dividend Comparison

PARNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.67%, more than NEEGX's 6.54% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PARNX
Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund
18.67%17.36%7.38%2.86%1.23%4.50%5.20%4.21%7.94%7.96%2.04%19.70%
NEEGX
Needham Growth Fund
6.54%7.57%3.92%0.00%1.78%6.92%5.73%11.31%17.79%9.70%4.22%6.74%

Drawdowns

PARNX vs. NEEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PARNX drawdown since its inception was -54.34%, roughly equal to the maximum NEEGX drawdown of -53.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PARNX and NEEGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PARNXNEEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.34%

-53.60%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.90%

-15.15%

+0.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.75%

-43.35%

+1.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.75%

-43.35%

+1.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.31%

-7.54%

-3.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.72%

-10.95%

-1.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.47%

4.61%

-0.14%

Volatility

PARNX vs. NEEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund (PARNX) is 7.40%, while Needham Growth Fund (NEEGX) has a volatility of 11.31%. This indicates that PARNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PARNXNEEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.40%

11.31%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.36%

20.91%

-6.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.06%

32.23%

-7.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.88%

28.04%

-4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.80%

25.01%

-3.21%