PARNX vs. FSMDX
PARNX (Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund) and FSMDX (Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund) are both mutual funds - PARNX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Parnassus, while FSMDX is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell Midcap Index. Over the past 10 years, PARNX returned 10.08%/yr vs 12.12%/yr for FSMDX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PARNX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for FSMDX.
Performance
PARNX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PARNX achieves a 6.67% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PARNX has underperformed FSMDX with an annualized return of 10.08%, while FSMDX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.12% annualized return.
PARNX
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 5.07%
- YTD
- 6.67%
- 6M
- 4.64%
- 1Y
- 17.61%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 10.08%
FSMDX
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 14.03%
- 6M
- 12.50%
- 1Y
- 22.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
PARNX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PARNX Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund | 6.67% | 9.14% | 10.58% | 35.60% | -33.54% | 9.35% | 28.75% | 29.82% | -9.80% | 16.12% |
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | 14.03% | 10.58% | 15.55% | 17.20% | -17.27% | 22.56% | 17.13% | 30.53% | -9.38% | 18.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between PARNX and FSMDX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011 | 0.89 |
The correlation between PARNX and FSMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PARNX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank
PARNX
FSMDX
PARNX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund (PARNX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PARNX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.30 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.31 | 2.90 | -1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.31 | 11.11 | -6.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PARNX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PARNX drawdown since its inception was -54.34%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PARNX and FSMDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PARNX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.34% | -40.35% | -13.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.49% | -8.16% | -6.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.87% | -20.92% | -6.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.75% | -26.07% | -15.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.75% | -40.35% | -1.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.52% | -0.26% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.67% | -4.94% | -7.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 2.13% | +2.25% |
Volatility
PARNX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison
Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund (PARNX) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 4.43%. This indicates that PARNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PARNX | FSMDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.16% | 4.43% | +2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.29% | 10.46% | +4.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.41% | 13.85% | +5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 18.32% | +5.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 19.35% | +2.61% |
PARNX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PARNX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
PARNX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison
PARNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.27%, more than FSMDX's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSMDX Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund | 0.97% | 1.10% | 2.46% | 1.39% | 2.07% | 3.35% | 2.34% | 2.86% | 2.21% | 2.17% | 2.23% | 2.84% |
PARNX Parnassus Mid Cap Growth Fund | 16.27% | 17.36% | 7.38% | 2.86% | 1.23% | 4.50% | 5.20% | 4.21% | 7.94% | 7.96% | 2.04% | 19.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PARNX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PARNX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to FSMDX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PARNX dropped -54.34% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.
FSMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PARNX and FSMDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer