PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAR vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PAR vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAR achieves a -60.94% return, which is significantly lower than NVDA's 15.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PAR has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 12.12%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 68.84% annualized return.


PAR

1D
-7.33%
1M
-1.12%
YTD
-60.94%
6M
-59.54%
1Y
-78.34%
3Y*
-26.04%
5Y*
-26.22%
10Y*
12.12%

NVDA

1D
-3.62%
1M
8.20%
YTD
15.15%
6M
19.59%
1Y
52.10%
3Y*
76.15%
5Y*
65.05%
10Y*
68.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAR vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAR
PAR Technology Corporation
-60.94%-50.08%66.90%67.01%-50.60%-15.96%104.26%43.13%132.62%67.56%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
15.15%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PAR and NVDA is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 1999

0.20

The correlation between PAR and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAR:

$580.93M

NVDA:

$5.24T

EPS

PAR:

-$1.88

NVDA:

$6.53

PS Ratio

PAR:

1.21

NVDA:

20.72

PB Ratio

PAR:

0.70

NVDA:

26.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAR:

$475.66M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAR:

$190.78M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAR:

-$33.08M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAR vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAR
PAR Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAR Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
PAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAR Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAR vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PARNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.69

1.26

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.94

2.59

-3.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.42

6.36

-7.78

PAR vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAR Sharpe Ratio is -1.19, which is lower than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAR and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PARNVDADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.19

1.53

-2.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

1.27

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

1.39

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.06

0.63

-0.57

Drawdowns

PAR vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAR drawdown since its inception was -90.88%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAR and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PARNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.88%

-89.72%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-83.41%

-20.21%

-63.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-85.43%

-36.88%

-48.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.43%

-66.34%

-19.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.68%

-66.34%

-20.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.03%

-8.90%

-75.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-53.34%

-36.21%

-17.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

55.20%

8.21%

+46.99%

Volatility

PAR vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) has a higher volatility of 21.87% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.53%. This indicates that PAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PARNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.87%

12.53%

+9.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.91%

25.54%

+32.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.22%

34.22%

+32.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.14%

51.69%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.39%

49.80%

+6.59%

Dividends

PAR vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

PAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%
PAR
PAR Technology Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PAR vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PAR Technology Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B20222023202420252026
123.97M
81.62B
(PAR) Total Revenue
(NVDA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAR vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PAR Technology Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
44.0%
74.9%
Portfolio components
PAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PAR Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 54.50M and revenue of 123.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

PAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PAR Technology Corporation reported an operating income of -16.17M and revenue of 123.97M, resulting in an operating margin of -13.0%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

PAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PAR Technology Corporation reported a net income of -16.17M and revenue of 123.97M, resulting in a net margin of -13.0%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PAR and NVDA have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAR has higher volatility (21.87%) compared to NVDA (12.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAR dropped -90.88% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

NVDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAR and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer