PortfoliosLab logo
PAR vs. AZO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PAR and AZO is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PAR vs. AZO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) and AutoZone, Inc. (AZO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PAR:

0.75

AZO:

1.86

Sortino Ratio

PAR:

1.68

AZO:

2.06

Omega Ratio

PAR:

1.20

AZO:

1.26

Calmar Ratio

PAR:

0.84

AZO:

2.07

Martin Ratio

PAR:

3.04

AZO:

10.51

Ulcer Index

PAR:

14.40%

AZO:

3.04%

Daily Std Dev

PAR:

45.94%

AZO:

21.30%

Max Drawdown

PAR:

-91.12%

AZO:

-46.33%

Current Drawdown

PAR:

-25.16%

AZO:

-0.54%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PAR:

$2.67B

AZO:

$64.78B

EPS

PAR:

-$2.55

AZO:

$148.71

PEG Ratio

PAR:

0.00

AZO:

1.93

PS Ratio

PAR:

6.95

AZO:

3.47

PB Ratio

PAR:

3.13

AZO:

13.38

Total Revenue (TTM)

PAR:

$383.77M

AZO:

$18.67B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PAR:

$168.41M

AZO:

$9.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

PAR:

-$51.93M

AZO:

$4.18B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAR achieves a -8.64% return, which is significantly lower than AZO's 20.53% return. Over the past 10 years, PAR has outperformed AZO with an annualized return of 32.24%, while AZO has yielded a comparatively lower 18.80% annualized return.


PAR

YTD

-8.64%

1M

18.89%

6M

-13.98%

1Y

33.72%

3Y*

23.25%

5Y*

20.61%

10Y*

32.24%

AZO

YTD

20.53%

1M

4.91%

6M

25.76%

1Y

39.19%

3Y*

28.82%

5Y*

28.01%

10Y*

18.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PAR Technology Corporation

AutoZone, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PAR vs. AZO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PAR is 7979
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PAR is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PAR is 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PAR is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PAR is 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PAR is 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AZO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AZO is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AZO is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AZO is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AZO is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AZO is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AZO is 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PAR vs. AZO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) and AutoZone, Inc. (AZO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PAR Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the AZO Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAR and AZO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

PAR vs. AZO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PAR nor AZO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

PAR vs. AZO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAR drawdown since its inception was -91.12%, which is greater than AZO's maximum drawdown of -46.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAR and AZO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

PAR vs. AZO - Volatility Comparison

PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) has a higher volatility of 9.84% compared to AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) at 5.60%. This indicates that PAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PAR vs. AZO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PAR Technology Corporation and AutoZone, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
103.86M
3.95B
(PAR) Total Revenue
(AZO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PAR vs. AZO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PAR Technology Corporation and AutoZone, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
46.6%
53.9%
(PAR) Gross Margin
(AZO) Gross Margin
PAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PAR Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 48.34M and revenue of 103.86M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.6%.

AZO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.13B and revenue of 3.95B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

PAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PAR Technology Corporation reported an operating income of -24.55M and revenue of 103.86M, resulting in an operating margin of -23.6%.

AZO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 706.77M and revenue of 3.95B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.9%.

PAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, PAR Technology Corporation reported a net income of -24.35M and revenue of 103.86M, resulting in a net margin of -23.5%.

AZO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 487.92M and revenue of 3.95B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.