PAR vs. MPC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC).

Performance

PAR vs. MPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAR vs. MPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAR PAR Technology Corporation	-63.26%	-50.08%	66.90%	67.01%	-50.60%	-15.96%	104.26%	43.13%	132.62%	67.56%
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation	50.90%	19.17%	-4.06%	30.46%	86.62%	61.00%	-27.38%	6.05%	-8.23%	34.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PAR : $539.51M MPC : $73.01B
EPS PAR : -$2.08 MPC : $13.31
PS Ratio PAR : 1.19 MPC : 0.56
PB Ratio PAR : 0.65 MPC : 3.06
Total Revenue (TTM) PAR : $455.55M MPC : $132.97B
Gross Profit (TTM) PAR : $198.03M MPC : $10.27B
EBITDA (TTM) PAR : -$41.44M MPC : $11.63B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAR achieves a -63.26% return, which is significantly lower than MPC's 50.90% return. Over the past 10 years, PAR has underperformed MPC with an annualized return of 7.42%, while MPC has yielded a comparatively higher 24.77% annualized return.

PAR

• 1D: 3.90%
• 1M: -18.67%
• YTD: -63.26%
• 6M: -66.32%
• 1Y: -78.27%
• 3Y*: -26.78%
• 5Y*: -27.38%
• 10Y*: 7.42%

MPC

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 23.19%
• YTD: 50.90%
• 6M: 27.96%
• 1Y: 71.20%
• 3Y*: 24.54%
• 5Y*: 37.72%
• 10Y*: 24.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PAR vs. MPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAR

PAR Risk / Return Rank: 2
PAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
PAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
PAR Omega Ratio Rank: 1
PAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PAR Martin Ratio Rank: 4

MPC

MPC Risk / Return Rank: 89
MPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
MPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
MPC Omega Ratio Rank: 89
MPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
MPC Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAR vs. MPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) and Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAR	MPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.27	2.03	-3.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-2.56	2.49	-5.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.65	1.37	-0.72
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.95	3.68	-4.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.78	9.99	-11.77
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAR vs. MPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAR Sharpe Ratio is -1.27, which is lower than the MPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAR and MPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAR	MPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.27	2.03	-3.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.50	1.16	-1.66
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.13	0.62	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.55	-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between PAR and MPC is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PAR vs. MPC - Dividend Comparison

PAR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAR PAR Technology Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MPC Marathon Petroleum Corporation	1.56%	2.29%	2.43%	2.07%	2.14%	3.63%	5.61%	3.52%	3.12%	2.30%	2.70%	2.20%

Drawdowns

PAR vs. MPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAR drawdown since its inception was -90.88%, which is greater than MPC's maximum drawdown of -79.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAR and MPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAR	MPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.88%	-79.67%	-11.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-82.02%	-19.84%	-62.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.88%	-44.75%	-40.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-85.56%	-79.67%	-5.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-84.97%	-3.07%	-81.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.19%	-17.50%	-35.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	44.00%	7.31%	+36.69%

Volatility

PAR vs. MPC - Volatility Comparison

PAR Technology Corporation (PAR) has a higher volatility of 17.55% compared to Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) at 10.32%. This indicates that PAR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAR	MPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.55%	10.32%	+7.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.21%	23.91%	+29.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.93%	35.26%	+26.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.43%	32.62%	+22.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.93%	40.20%	+15.73%

Financials

PAR vs. MPC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PAR Technology Corporation and Marathon Petroleum Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PAR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PAR Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 49.48M and revenue of 120.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.2%.

MPC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.16B and revenue of 32.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.6%.

PAR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PAR Technology Corporation reported an operating income of -33.42M and revenue of 120.10M, resulting in an operating margin of -27.8%.

MPC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported an operating income of 2.32B and revenue of 32.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

PAR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PAR Technology Corporation reported a net income of -20.89M and revenue of 120.10M, resulting in a net margin of -17.4%.

MPC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Marathon Petroleum Corporation reported a net income of 1.54B and revenue of 32.85B, resulting in a net margin of 4.7%.