PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PANW vs. TPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PANW vs. TPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 96.88% return, which is significantly higher than TPL's 33.31% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has underperformed TPL with an annualized return of 32.37%, while TPL has yielded a comparatively higher 36.05% annualized return.


PANW

1D
-1.00%
1M
1.43%
6M
117.53%
YTD
96.88%
1Y
114.48%
3Y*
49.21%
5Y*
41.30%
10Y*
32.37%
ALL TIME*
29.92%

TPL

1D
-3.45%
1M
-5.19%
6M
10.52%
YTD
33.31%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
27.53%
5Y*
19.79%
10Y*
36.05%
ALL TIME*
19.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.08B$2.21B$2.38B
$120.04M$115.71M$154.42M

PANW vs. TPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
96.88%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%22.78%29.95%15.91%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
33.31%-21.61%115.31%-32.40%91.29%73.25%-4.69%44.58%21.96%51.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PANW and TPL is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2012

0.13

The correlation between PANW and TPL shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.15 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PANW:

$295.57B

TPL:

$26.34B

EPS

PANW:

$1.17

TPL:

$7.84

PE Ratio

PANW:

310.68

TPL:

48.69

PEG Ratio

PANW:

0.02

TPL:

2.58

PS Ratio

PANW:

24.69

TPL:

29.37

PB Ratio

PANW:

9.75

TPL:

15.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

PANW:

$10.61B

TPL:

$897.54M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PANW:

$7.63B

TPL:

$900.39M

EBITDA (TTM)

PANW:

$1.33B

TPL:

$744.93M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PANW vs. TPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TPL
TPL Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
TPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
TPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
TPL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PANW vs. TPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PANWTPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.12

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.59

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.47

1.27

+6.20

PANW vs. TPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the TPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and TPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PANW vs. TPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum TPL drawdown of -73.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and TPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PANWTPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-73.05%

+25.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-34.23%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-52.22%

+16.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-52.50%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-65.46%

+17.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.00%

-33.13%

+32.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.58%

-27.28%

+12.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.38%

16.02%

-0.64%

Volatility

PANW vs. TPL - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 14.88% compared to Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL) at 10.79%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PANWTPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.88%

10.79%

+4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.72%

37.38%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.23%

47.84%

-6.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.53%

46.33%

-3.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.98%

47.30%

-8.32%

Dividends

PANW vs. TPL - Dividend Comparison

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TPL
Texas Pacific Land Corporation
0.59%0.74%1.37%0.83%1.37%0.88%2.20%0.22%0.55%0.30%0.10%0.22%

Financials

PANW vs. TPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PANW vs. TPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

TPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 246.06M and revenue of 246.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.

TPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported an operating income of 191.82M and revenue of 246.06M, resulting in an operating margin of 78.0%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.

TPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Texas Pacific Land Corporation reported a net income of 153.93M and revenue of 246.06M, resulting in a net margin of 62.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PANW and TPL have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PANW has higher volatility (14.88%) compared to TPL (10.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs TPL's -73.05%.

PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PANW and TPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer