PANW vs. PATH
PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) and PATH (UiPath Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Software - Infrastructure industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 5 years, PANW returned 35.30%/yr vs -30.46%/yr for PATH. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PANW vs. PATH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 44.59% return, which is significantly higher than PATH's -31.85% return.
PANW
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- 28.12%
- YTD
- 44.59%
- 6M
- 36.33%
- 1Y
- 33.43%
- 3Y*
- 34.26%
- 5Y*
- 35.30%
- 10Y*
- 28.39%
PATH
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- -31.85%
- 6M
- -42.09%
- 1Y
- -15.44%
- 3Y*
- -13.35%
- 5Y*
- -30.46%
- 10Y*
- —
PANW vs. PATH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 44.59% | 1.23% | 23.41% | 111.32% | -24.81% | 56.13% |
PATH UiPath Inc. | -31.85% | 28.95% | -48.83% | 95.44% | -70.53% | -37.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between PANW and PATH is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.49 |
Fundamentals
PANW:
$198.15B
PATH:
$5.90B
PANW:
$1.17
PATH:
$0.61
PANW:
227.13
PATH:
18.43
PANW:
18.05
PATH:
3.61
PANW:
7.16
PATH:
3.10
PANW:
$10.61B
PATH:
$1.67B
PANW:
$7.63B
PATH:
$1.39B
PANW:
$1.33B
PATH:
$115.98M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PANW vs. PATH — Risk / Return Rank
PANW
PATH
PANW vs. PATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and UiPath Inc. (PATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PANW | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.28 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.01 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | -0.30 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.12 | -0.55 | +2.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PANW | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | -0.24 | +1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | -0.48 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | -0.47 | +1.18 |
Drawdowns
PANW vs. PATH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum PATH drawdown of -88.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and PATH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PANW | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.98% | -88.98% | +41.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.01% | -51.37% | +15.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.01% | -65.10% | +29.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -87.33% | +51.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.37% | -86.88% | +75.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.69% | -73.75% | +59.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.82% | 28.16% | -12.34% |
Volatility
PANW vs. PATH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) is 17.10%, while UiPath Inc. (PATH) has a volatility of 19.80%. This indicates that PANW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PANW | PATH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.10% | 19.80% | -2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.83% | 43.04% | -11.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.54% | 63.65% | -25.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.65% | 63.64% | -21.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.59% | 64.24% | -25.65% |
Dividends
PANW vs. PATH - Dividend Comparison
Neither PANW nor PATH has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
PANW vs. PATH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and UiPath Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PANW vs. PATH - Profitability Comparison
PANW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
PATH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a gross profit of 341.45M and revenue of 418.38M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.6%.
PANW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.
PATH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported an operating income of 27.99M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.
PANW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.
PATH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, UiPath Inc. reported a net income of 22.53M and revenue of 418.38M, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PANW and PATH have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PATH has higher volatility (19.80%) compared to PANW (17.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs PATH's -88.98%.
PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PANW and PATH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer