PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PANW vs. MA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PANW vs. MA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 47.69% return, which is significantly higher than MA's -13.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PANW has outperformed MA with an annualized return of 28.09%, while MA has yielded a comparatively lower 18.35% annualized return.


PANW

1D
-2.58%
1M
48.11%
YTD
47.69%
6M
36.82%
1Y
38.02%
3Y*
34.28%
5Y*
35.50%
10Y*
28.09%

MA

1D
1.93%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
-13.70%
6M
-9.69%
1Y
-15.62%
3Y*
9.57%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
18.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PANW vs. MA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
47.69%1.23%23.41%111.32%-24.81%56.66%53.68%22.78%29.95%15.91%
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
-13.70%9.04%24.17%23.40%-2.66%1.16%20.19%59.16%25.31%47.69%

Correlation

The correlation between PANW and MA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2012

0.36

The correlation between PANW and MA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PANW:

$202.41B

MA:

$438.53B

EPS

PANW:

$1.17

MA:

$17.28

PE Ratio

PANW:

232.01

MA:

28.43

PEG Ratio

PANW:

0.02

MA:

1.66

PS Ratio

PANW:

18.44

MA:

13.04

PB Ratio

PANW:

7.32

MA:

65.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

PANW:

$10.61B

MA:

$33.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PANW:

$7.63B

MA:

$26.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

PANW:

$1.33B

MA:

$21.23B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PANW vs. MA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANW
PANW Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PANW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PANW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PANW Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
PANW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PANW Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

MA
MA Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
MA Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
MA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PANW vs. MA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Mastercard Incorporated (MA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PANWMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.89

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.06

-0.75

+1.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

-1.54

+3.95

PANW vs. MA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANW Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the MA Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANW and MA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PANWMADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

-0.71

+1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.28

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.68

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.83

-0.12

Drawdowns

PANW vs. MA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, smaller than the maximum MA drawdown of -62.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and MA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PANWMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.98%

-62.67%

+14.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.01%

-20.91%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.01%

-20.91%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.01%

-28.25%

-7.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.98%

-41.00%

-6.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.46%

-17.64%

+8.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.69%

-9.82%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.81%

10.19%

+5.62%

Volatility

PANW vs. MA - Volatility Comparison

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 17.46% compared to Mastercard Incorporated (MA) at 6.54%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PANWMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.46%

6.54%

+10.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.75%

17.46%

+14.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.44%

22.23%

+16.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.63%

23.98%

+17.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.58%

26.92%

+11.66%

Dividends

PANW vs. MA - Dividend Comparison

PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MA
Mastercard Incorporated
0.66%0.53%0.50%0.53%0.56%0.49%0.45%0.44%0.53%0.58%0.74%0.66%
PANW
Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PANW vs. MA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
3.00B
8.40B
(PANW) Total Revenue
(MA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PANW vs. MA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Mastercard Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
67.6%
58.4%
Portfolio components
PANW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.

MA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a gross profit of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.4%.

PANW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.

MA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported an operating income of 4.91B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 58.4%.

PANW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.

MA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mastercard Incorporated reported a net income of 3.88B and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 46.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PANW and MA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PANW has higher volatility (17.46%) compared to MA (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs MA's -62.67%.

PANW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.99 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PANW and MA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer