PANW vs. GOLF
PANW (Palo Alto Networks, Inc.) and GOLF (Acushnet Holdings Corp.) are both stocks. PANW operates in Software - Infrastructure (Technology), while GOLF operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 5 years, PANW returned 35.61%/yr vs 15.83%/yr for GOLF. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PANW vs. GOLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PANW achieves a 51.80% return, which is significantly higher than GOLF's 23.65% return.
PANW
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 17.38%
- YTD
- 51.80%
- 6M
- 45.87%
- 1Y
- 42.47%
- 3Y*
- 33.77%
- 5Y*
- 35.61%
- 10Y*
- 29.12%
GOLF
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 14.41%
- YTD
- 23.65%
- 6M
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 42.41%
- 3Y*
- 25.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- —
PANW vs. GOLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 51.80% | 1.23% | 23.41% | 111.32% | -24.81% | 56.66% | 53.68% | 22.78% | 29.95% | 15.91% |
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 23.65% | 14.09% | 13.96% | 51.02% | -18.69% | 32.71% | 27.13% | 57.63% | 2.09% | 9.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PANW and GOLF is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2016 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PANW and GOLF has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
PANW:
$208.04B
GOLF:
$5.89B
PANW:
$1.17
GOLF:
$2.83
PANW:
238.46
GOLF:
34.73
PANW:
0.02
GOLF:
4.83
PANW:
18.95
GOLF:
2.27
PANW:
7.52
GOLF:
7.14
PANW:
$10.61B
GOLF:
$2.61B
PANW:
$7.63B
GOLF:
$1.24B
PANW:
$1.33B
GOLF:
$321.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PANW vs. GOLF — Risk / Return Rank
PANW
GOLF
PANW vs. GOLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) and Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PANW | GOLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.16 | 2.14 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.62 | 5.43 | -2.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PANW vs. GOLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PANW drawdown since its inception was -47.98%, which is greater than GOLF's maximum drawdown of -35.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANW and GOLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PANW | GOLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.98% | -35.46% | -12.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.01% | -17.93% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.01% | -25.49% | -10.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.01% | -33.37% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -4.44% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -9.38% | -5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.87% | 7.06% | +8.81% |
Volatility
PANW vs. GOLF - Volatility Comparison
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (PANW) has a higher volatility of 16.97% compared to Acushnet Holdings Corp. (GOLF) at 7.56%. This indicates that PANW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PANW | GOLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.97% | 7.56% | +9.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.33% | 21.00% | +11.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.96% | 28.03% | +10.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.72% | 31.28% | +10.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.62% | 31.44% | +7.18% |
Dividends
PANW vs. GOLF - Dividend Comparison
PANW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GOLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOLF Acushnet Holdings Corp. | 1.25% | 1.49% | 1.21% | 1.23% | 1.70% | 1.24% | 1.53% | 1.72% | 2.47% | 2.28% |
PANW Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PANW vs. GOLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Acushnet Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PANW vs. GOLF - Profitability Comparison
PANW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.6%.
GOLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 355.26M and revenue of 752.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.2%.
PANW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported an operating income of -186.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in an operating margin of -6.2%.
GOLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 120.15M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.
PANW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Palo Alto Networks, Inc. reported a net income of -177.00M and revenue of 3.00B, resulting in a net margin of -5.9%.
GOLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Acushnet Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 81.42M and revenue of 752.98M, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PANW and GOLF have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PANW has higher volatility (16.97%) compared to GOLF (7.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANW dropped -47.98% vs GOLF's -35.46%.
GOLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PANW and GOLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer