PANG vs. ASMG

Last updated Jul 4, 2026

PANG (Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF) and ASMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PANG returned 124.18% vs 266.50% for ASMG. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

PANG vs. ASMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF (PANG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PANG achieves a 199.67% return, which is significantly higher than ASMG's 125.87% return.

PANG

• 1D: -2.36%
• 1M: 50.17%
• 6M: 217.60%
• YTD: 199.67%
• 1Y: 124.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASMG

• 1D: -8.51%
• 1M: -0.74%
• 6M: 92.40%
• YTD: 125.87%
• 1Y: 266.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PANG vs. ASMG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PANG Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF	199.67%	-14.75%
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	125.87%	72.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PANG and ASMG is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2025	0.17

Return for Risk

PANG vs. ASMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PANG

PANG Risk / Return Rank: 51
PANG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
PANG Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
PANG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PANG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PANG Martin Ratio Rank: 34

ASMG

ASMG Risk / Return Rank: 88
ASMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ASMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
ASMG Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ASMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
ASMG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PANG vs. ASMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF (PANG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PANG	ASMG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	2.90	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.18	2.94	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.36	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	7.59	-5.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.31	18.62	-14.31

PANG vs. ASMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PANG Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the ASMG Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PANG and ASMG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PANG vs. ASMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PANG drawdown since its inception was -62.38%, which is greater than ASMG's maximum drawdown of -43.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PANG and ASMG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PANG	ASMG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.38%	-43.95%	-18.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-62.38%	-34.56%	-27.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.36%	-21.76%	+19.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.04%	-12.90%	-9.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	31.25%	14.06%	+17.19%

Volatility

PANG vs. ASMG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF (PANG) is 29.47%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF (ASMG) has a volatility of 43.77%. This indicates that PANG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PANG	ASMG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.47%	43.77%	-14.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	67.67%	74.81%	-7.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.62%	90.31%	-9.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.95%	89.25%	-7.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.95%	89.25%	-7.30%

PANG vs. ASMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PANG and ASMG have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

PANG vs. ASMG - Dividend Comparison

PANG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, less than ASMG's 4.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ASMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ASML Daily ETF	4.96%	11.20%
PANG Leverage Shares 2X Long PANW Daily ETF	3.91%	11.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PANG and ASMG in my portfolio?

PANG and ASMG have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PANG or ASMG?

ASMG has higher volatility (43.77%) compared to PANG (29.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PANG dropped -62.38% vs ASMG's -43.95%.

Which ETF is better, PANG or ASMG?

On 1-year performance, ASMG leads with 266.50% vs 124.18% for PANG. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PANG has been the lower-risk option at 29.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PANG or ASMG?

Over the 1-year period, ASMG has performed better with a 266.50% return vs 124.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PANG or ASMG?

PANG and ASMG have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PANG or ASMG?

ASMG has the higher dividend yield at 4.96%, compared with 3.91% for PANG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ASMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.