PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PALU vs. NUGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PALU vs. NUGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares (PALU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PALU achieves a 176.45% return, which is significantly higher than NUGT's -35.60% return.


PALU

1D
18.74%
1M
34.36%
YTD
176.45%
6M
167.92%
1Y
109.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NUGT

1D
-3.48%
1M
-30.75%
YTD
-35.60%
6M
-36.00%
1Y
67.73%
3Y*
52.08%
5Y*
16.37%
10Y*
-14.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PALU vs. NUGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PALU and NUGT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PALU vs. NUGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PALU
PALU Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PALU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PALU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PALU Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PALU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
PALU Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

NUGT
NUGT Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
NUGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUGT Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NUGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUGT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PALU vs. NUGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares (PALU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PALUNUGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

1.07

+0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

2.46

+1.08

PALU vs. NUGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PALU Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the NUGT Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PALU and NUGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PALU vs. NUGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PALU drawdown since its inception was -62.18%, smaller than the maximum NUGT drawdown of -99.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALU and NUGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PALUNUGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.18%

-99.97%

+37.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-62.18%

-63.43%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-99.85%

+99.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-91.54%

+69.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.11%

27.64%

+3.47%

Volatility

PALU vs. NUGT - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares (PALU) and Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF (NUGT) have volatilities of 35.14% and 34.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PALUNUGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

35.14%

34.35%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.42%

80.46%

-13.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

80.92%

94.53%

-13.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

82.35%

73.05%

+9.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

82.35%

87.97%

-5.62%

PALU vs. NUGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PALU has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is lower than NUGT's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

PALU vs. NUGT - Dividend Comparison

PALU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than NUGT's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NUGT
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Index Bull 2X ETF
0.61%0.22%1.79%1.67%0.70%0.00%0.00%0.63%0.57%
PALU
Direxion Daily PANW Bull 2X Shares
3.95%10.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PALU and NUGT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PALU has higher volatility (35.14%) compared to NUGT (34.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PALU dropped -62.18% vs NUGT's -99.97%.

On 1-year performance, PALU leads with 109.65% vs 67.73% for NUGT. On fees, PALU is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, NUGT has been the lower-risk option at 34.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, PALU has performed better with a 109.65% return vs 67.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PALU is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for NUGT.

PALU has the higher dividend yield at 3.95%, compared with 0.61% for NUGT.

PALU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NUGT is Gold. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for PALU and 1.13% for NUGT.

PALU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PALU and NUGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer