PALL vs. CPER
Compare and contrast key facts about Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and United States Copper Index Fund (CPER).
PALL and CPER are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PALL is a passively managed fund by Aberdeen that tracks the performance of the Palladium London PM Fix ($/ozt). It was launched on Jan 6, 2010. CPER is a passively managed fund by Concierge Technologies that tracks the performance of the SummerHaven Copper Index Total Return. It was launched on Nov 15, 2011. Both PALL and CPER are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PALL vs. CPER - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PALL vs. CPER - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PALL Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF | -7.34% | 74.07% | -17.38% | -38.77% | -6.28% | -23.26% | 25.27% | 53.94% | 17.23% | 55.73% |
CPER United States Copper Index Fund | -1.52% | 38.95% | 4.23% | 4.55% | -15.14% | 25.21% | 23.90% | 6.66% | -21.91% | 28.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PALL achieves a -7.34% return, which is significantly lower than CPER's -1.52% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PALL having a 9.50% annualized return and CPER not far behind at 9.10%.
PALL
- 1D
- 5.15%
- 1M
- -17.05%
- YTD
- -7.34%
- 6M
- 17.99%
- 1Y
- 48.77%
- 3Y*
- -0.08%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.50%
CPER
- 1D
- 2.50%
- 1M
- -6.64%
- YTD
- -1.52%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 8.96%
- 3Y*
- 11.35%
- 5Y*
- 6.82%
- 10Y*
- 9.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PALL vs. CPER - Expense Ratio Comparison
PALL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CPER's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PALL vs. CPER — Risk / Return Rank
PALL
CPER
PALL vs. CPER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) and United States Copper Index Fund (CPER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PALL | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 0.24 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 0.54 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.09 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.51 | 0.31 | +1.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.55 | 0.64 | +3.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PALL | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 0.24 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.28 | 0.26 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.38 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.09 | +0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between PALL and CPER is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PALL vs. CPER - Dividend Comparison
Neither PALL nor CPER has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PALL vs. CPER - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PALL drawdown since its inception was -73.63%, which is greater than CPER's maximum drawdown of -54.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PALL and CPER.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PALL | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.63% | -54.04% | -19.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.17% | -24.77% | -9.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -73.63% | -34.75% | -38.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.63% | -38.42% | -35.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.34% | -11.06% | -43.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.51% | -25.65% | -0.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.31% | 12.19% | -0.88% |
Volatility
PALL vs. CPER - Volatility Comparison
Aberdeen Standard Physical Palladium Shares ETF (PALL) has a higher volatility of 15.73% compared to United States Copper Index Fund (CPER) at 9.29%. This indicates that PALL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CPER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PALL | CPER | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.73% | 9.29% | +6.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.92% | 21.96% | +21.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.74% | 36.84% | +11.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.07% | 26.85% | +15.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.71% | 23.87% | +13.84% |