PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAJRX vs. URFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAJRX vs. URFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund (PAJRX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAJRX achieves a 4.88% return, which is significantly lower than URFFX's 13.05% return. Over the past 10 years, PAJRX has underperformed URFFX with an annualized return of 6.57%, while URFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.12% annualized return.


PAJRX

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.28%
6M
2.60%
YTD
4.88%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
9.21%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
6.57%
ALL TIME*
6.38%

URFFX

1D
1.41%
1M
0.64%
6M
9.62%
YTD
13.05%
1Y
24.29%
3Y*
16.22%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.12%
ALL TIME*
8.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PAJRX vs. URFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAJRX
T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund
4.88%11.19%8.25%12.09%-14.19%9.85%13.00%17.49%-4.84%12.62%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
13.05%19.35%11.86%18.12%-15.66%17.70%10.52%20.16%-9.01%19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between PAJRX and URFFX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 22, 2013

0.93

The correlation between PAJRX and URFFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAJRX vs. URFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PAJRX
PAJRX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PAJRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAJRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAJRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
PAJRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAJRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

URFFX
URFFX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
URFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
URFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
URFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
URFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PAJRX vs. URFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund (PAJRX) and USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAJRXURFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.87

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.95

12.30

-3.35

PAJRX vs. URFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAJRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the URFFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAJRX and URFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAJRX vs. URFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAJRX drawdown since its inception was -22.48%, smaller than the maximum URFFX drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAJRX and URFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAJRXURFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-44.25%

+21.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-7.89%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.27%

-14.14%

+6.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.72%

-23.76%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.48%

-29.97%

+7.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.17%

-0.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.31%

-5.88%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.12%

1.84%

-0.72%

Volatility

PAJRX vs. URFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund (PAJRX) is 1.58%, while USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund (URFFX) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that PAJRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAJRXURFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.58%

2.93%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.24%

9.82%

-4.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.31%

11.86%

-5.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.93%

13.97%

-6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.62%

14.33%

-5.71%

PAJRX vs. URFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAJRX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than URFFX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAJRX vs. URFFX - Dividend Comparison

PAJRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than URFFX's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAJRX
T. Rowe Price Target 2025 Fund
6.56%6.88%5.29%3.57%7.51%4.03%3.21%3.39%4.61%1.71%1.53%1.64%
URFFX
USAA Target Retirement 2050 Fund
5.72%6.46%2.61%3.39%11.40%8.13%6.25%11.76%10.21%5.55%3.91%2.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PAJRX and URFFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

URFFX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to PAJRX (1.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAJRX dropped -22.48% vs URFFX's -44.25%.

URFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAJRX and URFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer