PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAIRX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAIRX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund (PAIRX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAIRX achieves a 4.74% return, which is significantly lower than PLTZX's 8.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PAIRX has underperformed PLTZX with an annualized return of 6.14%, while PLTZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.56% annualized return.


PAIRX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.00%
6M
4.49%
YTD
4.74%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
9.39%
5Y*
4.08%
10Y*
6.14%

PLTZX

1D
0.15%
1M
-0.44%
6M
7.32%
YTD
8.24%
1Y
16.01%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAIRX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAIRX
T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund
4.74%10.70%7.69%11.09%-13.39%8.34%11.73%16.17%-4.25%11.01%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
8.24%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-9.24%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PAIRX and PLTZX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2013

0.92

The correlation between PAIRX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAIRX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAIRX
PAIRX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
PAIRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAIRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAIRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PAIRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAIRX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAIRX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund (PAIRX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PAIRXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.25

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

1.94

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.79

8.40

+1.40

PAIRX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAIRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAIRX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PAIRX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAIRX drawdown since its inception was -20.25%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAIRX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAIRXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.25%

-34.01%

+13.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.52%

-8.70%

+4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.45%

-15.73%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.43%

-26.79%

+8.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.25%

-34.01%

+13.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-1.31%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.06%

-4.61%

+1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.03%

2.01%

-0.98%

Volatility

PAIRX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund (PAIRX) is 2.31%, while Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that PAIRX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAIRXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.31%

5.15%

-2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.87%

10.49%

-5.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.77%

12.56%

-6.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.09%

15.60%

-8.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.51%

15.93%

-8.42%

PAIRX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAIRX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAIRX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

PAIRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%, less than PLTZX's 7.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAIRX
T. Rowe Price Target 2020 Fund
5.18%5.42%5.55%4.00%8.22%4.79%4.56%3.33%4.74%1.67%1.23%1.13%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.70%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PAIRX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTZX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to PAIRX (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAIRX dropped -20.25% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

PAIRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAIRX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer