PAHHX vs. FNSFX
PAHHX (T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund) and FNSFX (Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, PAHHX returned 6.78%/yr vs 10.44%/yr for FNSFX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAHHX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FNSFX.
Performance
PAHHX vs. FNSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAHHX achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly lower than FNSFX's 12.78% return.
PAHHX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 16.34%
- 3Y*
- 13.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
FNSFX
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- 6M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.68%
- 5Y*
- 10.44%
- 10Y*
- —
PAHHX vs. FNSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAHHX T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund | 8.38% | 15.54% | 11.42% | 17.26% | -18.09% | 13.74% | 16.17% | 21.99% | -6.72% | 4.21% |
FNSFX Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K | 12.78% | 23.84% | 14.14% | 20.59% | -18.20% | 16.68% | 18.40% | 25.44% | -8.82% | 7.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAHHX and FNSFX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017 | 0.95 |
The correlation between PAHHX and FNSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAHHX vs. FNSFX — Risk / Return Rank
PAHHX
FNSFX
PAHHX vs. FNSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund (PAHHX) and Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAHHX | FNSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.33 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 2.58 | -0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.52 | 11.08 | -1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAHHX vs. FNSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAHHX drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, smaller than the maximum FNSFX drawdown of -30.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAHHX and FNSFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAHHX | FNSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -30.92% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.73% | -9.76% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.45% | -15.41% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.80% | -27.31% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -1.88% | +1.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.41% | -5.54% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.26% | -0.47% |
Volatility
PAHHX vs. FNSFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund (PAHHX) is 2.64%, while Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that PAHHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAHHX | FNSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 4.34% | -1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.44% | 12.18% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.14% | 14.14% | -4.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 15.25% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.60% | 16.01% | -3.41% |
PAHHX vs. FNSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAHHX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FNSFX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAHHX vs. FNSFX - Dividend Comparison
PAHHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than FNSFX's 4.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FNSFX Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K | 4.94% | 3.70% | 2.32% | 2.13% | 10.66% | 10.24% | 3.89% | 5.99% | 5.94% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAHHX T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund | 5.48% | 5.93% | 3.10% | 2.66% | 5.85% | 3.36% | 2.86% | 4.23% | 5.43% | 2.15% | 2.30% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, PAHHX and FNSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FNSFX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to PAHHX (2.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAHHX dropped -28.58% vs FNSFX's -30.92%.
FNSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAHHX and FNSFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer