PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FNSFX vs. FSKAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FNSFX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FNSFX achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's 9.87% return.


FNSFX

1D
2.30%
1M
-1.16%
6M
7.99%
YTD
12.12%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.43%

FSKAX

1D
1.63%
1M
-0.80%
6M
8.19%
YTD
9.87%
1Y
20.99%
3Y*
18.61%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
14.44%
ALL TIME*
14.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FNSFX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FNSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K
12.12%23.84%14.14%20.59%-18.20%16.68%18.40%25.44%-8.82%7.37%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
9.87%17.06%23.89%26.12%-19.53%25.66%20.79%30.92%-5.32%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FNSFX and FSKAX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2017

0.94

The correlation between FNSFX and FSKAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FNSFX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FNSFX
FNSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FNSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FNSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKAX
FSKAX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FSKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FNSFX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FNSFXFSKAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.25

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

2.09

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.88

8.96

+0.92

FNSFX vs. FSKAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FNSFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FSKAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FNSFX and FSKAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FNSFX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FNSFX drawdown since its inception was -30.92%, smaller than the maximum FSKAX drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FNSFX and FSKAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FNSFXFSKAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.92%

-35.01%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.76%

-8.92%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.41%

-19.43%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-25.39%

-1.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-1.97%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.53%

-3.99%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.08%

+0.25%

Volatility

FNSFX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K (FNSFX) has a higher volatility of 4.38% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 3.43%. This indicates that FNSFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FNSFXFSKAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.38%

3.43%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.43%

10.33%

+2.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.46%

13.21%

+1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.27%

17.52%

-2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.01%

18.45%

-2.44%

FNSFX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FNSFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FNSFX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison

FNSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than FSKAX's 0.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNSFX
Fidelity Freedom 2060 Fund Class K
4.97%3.70%2.32%2.13%10.66%10.24%3.89%5.99%5.94%2.45%0.00%0.00%
FSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
0.95%1.01%1.19%1.41%1.62%1.15%1.45%1.94%2.54%2.07%2.43%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FNSFX and FSKAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FNSFX has higher volatility (4.38%) compared to FSKAX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FNSFX dropped -30.92% vs FSKAX's -35.01%.

FNSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FNSFX and FSKAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer