PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAHHX vs. FRHMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAHHX vs. FRHMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund (PAHHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAHHX achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly higher than FRHMX's 4.14% return.


PAHHX

1D
0.37%
1M
3.60%
YTD
9.01%
6M
9.51%
1Y
20.52%
3Y*
15.14%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
9.38%

FRHMX

1D
0.21%
1M
1.57%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.37%
1Y
10.63%
3Y*
7.75%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAHHX vs. FRHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PAHHX
T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund
9.01%15.54%11.42%17.26%-18.09%13.74%16.17%6.55%
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
4.14%10.02%4.50%8.28%-11.48%2.98%8.79%3.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PAHHX and FRHMX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2019

0.72

The correlation between PAHHX and FRHMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAHHX vs. FRHMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAHHX
PAHHX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
PAHHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAHHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAHHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PAHHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAHHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

FRHMX
FRHMX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FRHMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRHMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRHMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FRHMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRHMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAHHX vs. FRHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund (PAHHX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAHHXFRHMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.26

2.58

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.23

3.80

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.52

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

3.13

-0.36

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.03

13.40

-1.37

PAHHX vs. FRHMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAHHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the FRHMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAHHX and FRHMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAHHXFRHMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

2.58

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.59

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.82

-0.11

Drawdowns

PAHHX vs. FRHMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAHHX drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than FRHMX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAHHX and FRHMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAHHXFRHMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.58%

-15.96%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.73%

-3.42%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.45%

-4.90%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.80%

-15.96%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.45%

-3.50%

-0.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

0.80%

+0.95%

Volatility

PAHHX vs. FRHMX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund (PAHHX) has a higher volatility of 2.85% compared to Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6 (FRHMX) at 1.67%. This indicates that PAHHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAHHXFRHMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

1.67%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.87%

3.43%

+4.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.50%

4.16%

+5.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.30%

5.29%

+7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.67%

5.15%

+7.52%

PAHHX vs. FRHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAHHX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FRHMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAHHX vs. FRHMX - Dividend Comparison

PAHHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.44%, more than FRHMX's 3.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRHMX
Fidelity Managed Retirement Income Fund Class K6
3.25%3.22%3.24%3.02%4.77%3.78%2.61%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PAHHX
T. Rowe Price Target 2040 Fund
5.44%5.93%3.10%2.66%5.85%3.36%2.86%4.23%5.43%2.15%2.30%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAHHX and FRHMX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAHHX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to FRHMX (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAHHX dropped -28.58% vs FRHMX's -15.96%.

FRHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAHHX and FRHMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer