PAGS vs. STZ

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ).

Performance

PAGS vs. STZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PAGS vs. STZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd.	5.01%	60.75%	-49.80%	42.68%	-66.67%	-53.90%	66.51%	82.38%	-35.86%
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc.	9.43%	-35.99%	-7.11%	5.83%	-6.43%	16.12%	17.41%	19.85%	-26.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PAGS : $2.91B STZ : $26.19B
EPS PAGS : $7.20 STZ : $6.30
PE Ratio PAGS : 1.39 STZ : 23.82
PEG Ratio PAGS : 0.07 STZ : 1.81
PS Ratio PAGS : 0.15 STZ : 2.82
PB Ratio PAGS : 0.20 STZ : 3.27
Total Revenue (TTM) PAGS : $19.82B STZ : $9.38B
Gross Profit (TTM) PAGS : $10.07B STZ : $4.88B
EBITDA (TTM) PAGS : $8.85B STZ : $2.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAGS achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly lower than STZ's 9.43% return.

PAGS

• 1D: 3.19%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: 5.01%
• 6M: 2.54%
• 1Y: 38.49%
• 3Y*: 7.23%
• 5Y*: -26.28%
• 10Y*: —

STZ

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -4.98%
• YTD: 9.43%
• 6M: 12.99%
• 1Y: -16.14%
• 3Y*: -11.04%
• 5Y*: -6.58%
• 10Y*: 1.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PAGS vs. STZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAGS

PAGS Risk / Return Rank: 67
PAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
PAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 68

STZ

STZ Risk / Return Rank: 22
STZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
STZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
STZ Omega Ratio Rank: 18
STZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
STZ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAGS vs. STZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) and Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PAGS	STZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.76	-0.57	+1.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.38	-0.66	+2.05
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.92	+0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.52	-0.48	+2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.06	-0.78	+3.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PAGS vs. STZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.76, which is higher than the STZ Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAGS and STZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PAGS	STZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76	-0.57	+1.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.43	-0.28	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.19	0.46	-0.65

Correlation

The correlation between PAGS and STZ is 0.24, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PAGS vs. STZ - Dividend Comparison

PAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than STZ's 2.72% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PAGS PagSeguro Digital Ltd.	4.99%	3.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STZ Constellation Brands, Inc.	2.72%	2.95%	1.77%	1.44%	1.36%	1.21%	1.37%	1.58%	1.70%	0.86%	0.98%	0.65%

Drawdowns

PAGS vs. STZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAGS drawdown since its inception was -90.00%, which is greater than STZ's maximum drawdown of -67.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGS and STZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAGS	STZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.00%	-67.39%	-22.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.92%	-33.85%	+11.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.84%	-51.28%	-38.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.93%	-42.38%	-40.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.82%	-16.45%	-38.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.88%	20.79%	-9.91%

Volatility

PAGS vs. STZ - Volatility Comparison

PagSeguro Digital Ltd. (PAGS) has a higher volatility of 16.29% compared to Constellation Brands, Inc. (STZ) at 5.69%. This indicates that PAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAGS	STZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.29%	5.69%	+10.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.41%	20.40%	+13.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.85%	28.66%	+22.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.27%	23.86%	+37.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.39%	26.69%	+34.70%

Financials

PAGS vs. STZ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PagSeguro Digital Ltd. and Constellation Brands, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PAGS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.72B and revenue of 5.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

STZ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.18B and revenue of 2.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.2%.

PAGS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported an operating income of 2.07B and revenue of 5.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.0%.

STZ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported an operating income of 692.00M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.1%.

PAGS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PagSeguro Digital Ltd. reported a net income of 509.66M and revenue of 5.30B, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

STZ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Constellation Brands, Inc. reported a net income of 502.80M and revenue of 2.22B, resulting in a net margin of 22.6%.