PAGLX vs. MFWIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX).
PAGLX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Oct 26, 2008. MFWIX is managed by MFS. It was launched on Sep 4, 1990.
Performance
PAGLX vs. MFWIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAGLX vs. MFWIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGLX T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund | -6.68% | 14.37% | 18.57% | 18.99% | -29.87% | 10.73% | 43.90% | 30.55% | -7.22% | 34.08% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | -0.47% | 15.70% | 4.25% | 10.52% | -10.62% | 8.59% | 9.63% | 18.49% | -6.96% | 15.00% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAGLX achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than MFWIX's -0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, PAGLX has outperformed MFWIX with an annualized return of 10.87%, while MFWIX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.19% annualized return.
PAGLX
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -9.33%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -4.81%
- 1Y
- 10.32%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
MFWIX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 11.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.75%
- 10Y*
- 6.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAGLX vs. MFWIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAGLX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MFWIX's 0.84% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAGLX vs. MFWIX — Risk / Return Rank
PAGLX
MFWIX
PAGLX vs. MFWIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAGLX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.60 | 1.29 | -0.69 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.94 | 1.77 | -0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.72 | 1.59 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.92 | 6.26 | -3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAGLX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 | 1.29 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.52 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 | 0.65 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.71 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAGLX and MFWIX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAGLX vs. MFWIX - Dividend Comparison
PAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.40%, more than MFWIX's 8.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAGLX T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund | 12.40% | 11.57% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 8.74% | 3.13% | 0.20% | 1.38% | 0.75% | 0.21% | 4.82% |
MFWIX MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I | 8.81% | 8.77% | 9.36% | 3.98% | 2.94% | 10.71% | 7.53% | 4.70% | 3.64% | 2.36% | 1.40% | 4.59% |
Drawdowns
PAGLX vs. MFWIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAGLX drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, which is greater than MFWIX's maximum drawdown of -33.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGLX and MFWIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAGLX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -33.01% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.63% | -6.85% | -4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.76% | -20.22% | -19.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.76% | -23.36% | -16.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.51% | -6.50% | -4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.78% | -3.83% | -3.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 1.74% | +1.13% |
Volatility
PAGLX vs. MFWIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to MFS Global Total Return Fund Class I (MFWIX) at 3.04%. This indicates that PAGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFWIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAGLX | MFWIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 3.04% | +2.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 5.25% | +5.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.21% | 8.85% | +8.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.45% | 9.09% | +8.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.99% | 9.60% | +8.39% |