PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAGLX vs. MDGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAGLX vs. MDGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAGLX achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly lower than MDGCX's 19.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PAGLX having a 12.88% annualized return and MDGCX not far behind at 12.56%.


PAGLX

1D
0.47%
1M
6.77%
YTD
13.66%
6M
13.40%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
18.36%
5Y*
5.84%
10Y*
12.88%

MDGCX

1D
0.70%
1M
7.14%
YTD
19.80%
6M
21.05%
1Y
40.27%
3Y*
22.15%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
12.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAGLX vs. MDGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAGLX
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund
13.66%14.37%18.57%18.99%-29.87%10.73%43.90%30.55%-7.22%34.08%
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
19.80%23.61%10.87%22.43%-17.94%17.52%15.61%25.54%-11.73%23.41%

Correlation

The correlation between PAGLX and MDGCX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2008

0.92

The correlation between PAGLX and MDGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAGLX vs. MDGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAGLX
PAGLX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PAGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PAGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MDGCX
MDGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
MDGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MDGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAGLX vs. MDGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAGLXMDGCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.96

3.24

-1.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

4.35

-1.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.59

-0.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

5.05

-2.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.35

23.35

-13.01

PAGLX vs. MDGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAGLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the MDGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAGLX and MDGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAGLXMDGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

3.24

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

0.74

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.73

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.66

+0.02

Drawdowns

PAGLX vs. MDGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAGLX drawdown since its inception was -39.76%, smaller than the maximum MDGCX drawdown of -48.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAGLX and MDGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAGLXMDGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.76%

-48.25%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.51%

-8.07%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.71%

-21.46%

+3.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.76%

-26.68%

-13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.76%

-34.87%

-4.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.72%

-9.93%

+2.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.59%

1.74%

+0.85%

Volatility

PAGLX vs. MDGCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund (PAGLX) and BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc. (MDGCX) have volatilities of 3.92% and 3.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAGLXMDGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

3.75%

+0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

10.02%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.73%

12.57%

+1.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.52%

16.15%

+1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.25%

+0.80%

PAGLX vs. MDGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAGLX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MDGCX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAGLX vs. MDGCX - Dividend Comparison

PAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.18%, more than MDGCX's 7.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDGCX
BlackRock Advantage Global Fund, Inc.
7.44%8.91%7.78%1.42%1.75%16.75%3.77%1.73%4.06%34.82%0.65%5.18%
PAGLX
T. Rowe Price Global Growth Stock Fund
10.18%11.57%0.00%0.08%0.07%8.74%3.13%0.20%1.38%0.75%0.21%4.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, PAGLX and MDGCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PAGLX has higher volatility (3.92%) compared to MDGCX (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAGLX dropped -39.76% vs MDGCX's -48.25%.

MDGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAGLX and MDGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer