PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAFRX vs. RSFYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAFRX vs. RSFYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) and Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAFRX achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than RSFYX's 3.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PAFRX has underperformed RSFYX with an annualized return of 4.45%, while RSFYX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.84% annualized return.


PAFRX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.21%
YTD
1.20%
6M
1.88%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
7.64%
5Y*
5.11%
10Y*
4.45%

RSFYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.09%
YTD
3.22%
6M
4.01%
1Y
8.14%
3Y*
8.30%
5Y*
4.03%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAFRX vs. RSFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PAFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
1.20%6.37%7.89%10.68%-2.11%4.38%1.53%8.32%-0.29%3.27%
RSFYX
Victory Floating Rate Fund
3.22%7.09%8.64%7.48%-6.82%4.12%4.96%9.68%0.69%4.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PAFRX and RSFYX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2011

0.66

Over the past year, the correlation between PAFRX and RSFYX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAFRX vs. RSFYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAFRX
PAFRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PAFRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAFRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAFRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
PAFRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAFRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

RSFYX
RSFYX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RSFYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSFYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSFYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RSFYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSFYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAFRX vs. RSFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) and Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAFRXRSFYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.85

1.76

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

5.90

-2.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.44

19.49

-6.05

PAFRX vs. RSFYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAFRX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the RSFYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAFRX and RSFYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAFRXRSFYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.04

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.93

1.13

+0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.18

1.15

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.25

-0.01

Drawdowns

PAFRX vs. RSFYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAFRX drawdown since its inception was -19.95%, smaller than the maximum RSFYX drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAFRX and RSFYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAFRXRSFYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-21.42%

+1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.51%

-1.39%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.47%

-2.76%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.03%

-8.82%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.95%

-21.42%

+1.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.13%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-1.34%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

0.42%

-0.02%

Volatility

PAFRX vs. RSFYX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund (PAFRX) has a higher volatility of 0.61% compared to Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) at 0.54%. This indicates that PAFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAFRXRSFYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.61%

0.54%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.71%

3.24%

-1.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25%

4.00%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.66%

3.60%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.79%

4.23%

-0.44%

PAFRX vs. RSFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAFRX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than RSFYX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAFRX vs. RSFYX - Dividend Comparison

PAFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.62%, less than RSFYX's 7.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAFRX
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate Fund
6.62%6.81%7.34%6.87%3.85%3.66%3.79%4.62%4.64%3.83%3.87%3.96%
RSFYX
Victory Floating Rate Fund
7.75%9.39%9.01%8.22%6.22%4.16%5.47%6.07%5.93%5.07%4.99%5.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAFRX and RSFYX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAFRX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to RSFYX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAFRX dropped -19.95% vs RSFYX's -21.42%.

PAFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAFRX and RSFYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer