PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAFMX vs. PNOPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAFMX vs. PNOPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2045 Fund (PAFMX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAFMX achieves a 9.48% return, which is significantly higher than PNOPX's 4.12% return.


PAFMX

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.03%
YTD
9.48%
6M
10.24%
1Y
23.55%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*

PNOPX

1D
-0.66%
1M
3.35%
YTD
4.12%
6M
3.63%
1Y
18.38%
3Y*
17.22%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
15.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAFMX vs. PNOPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PAFMX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2045 Fund
9.48%18.27%15.76%25.02%-16.53%17.61%14.31%
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
4.12%10.93%22.97%26.23%-22.86%23.44%27.17%

Correlation

The correlation between PAFMX and PNOPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.95

The correlation between PAFMX and PNOPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAFMX vs. PNOPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAFMX
PAFMX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PAFMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAFMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAFMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PAFMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAFMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PNOPX
PNOPX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
PNOPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNOPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNOPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PNOPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNOPX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAFMX vs. PNOPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2045 Fund (PAFMX) and Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAFMXPNOPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.28

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

1.43

+1.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.15

5.36

+9.79

PAFMX vs. PNOPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAFMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the PNOPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAFMX and PNOPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAFMXPNOPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.52

+0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.52

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.55

+0.23

Drawdowns

PAFMX vs. PNOPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAFMX drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, smaller than the maximum PNOPX drawdown of -74.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAFMX and PNOPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAFMXPNOPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.22%

-74.15%

+44.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.22%

-13.06%

+5.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.04%

-22.90%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.63%

-29.13%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.66%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.11%

-24.03%

+18.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.58%

3.48%

-1.90%

Volatility

PAFMX vs. PNOPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2045 Fund (PAFMX) is 2.78%, while Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund (PNOPX) has a volatility of 3.32%. This indicates that PAFMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNOPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAFMXPNOPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.78%

3.32%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

9.46%

-1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.82%

12.30%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.26%

17.36%

-4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.76%

18.15%

-2.39%

PAFMX vs. PNOPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAFMX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PNOPX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAFMX vs. PNOPX - Dividend Comparison

PAFMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.79%, which matches PNOPX's 10.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAFMX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2045 Fund
10.79%11.82%5.67%2.72%12.24%15.59%1.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PNOPX
Putnam Sustainable Leaders Fund
10.77%11.22%9.25%2.96%8.38%11.69%7.41%7.14%20.24%4.91%0.00%12.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PAFMX and PNOPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PNOPX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to PAFMX (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAFMX dropped -29.22% vs PNOPX's -74.15%.

PAFMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAFMX and PNOPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer