PAFGX vs. PRWCX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX).
PAFGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on May 27, 2013. PRWCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 30, 1986.
Performance
PAFGX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAFGX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAFGX T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund | -2.27% | 14.75% | 9.43% | 13.48% | -14.80% | 8.83% | 14.45% | 19.91% | -7.15% | 15.77% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | -5.03% | 20.92% | 12.50% | 18.85% | -12.00% | 18.45% | 18.13% | 24.62% | 0.63% | 15.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAFGX achieves a -2.27% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's -5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PAFGX has underperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 7.15%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.20% annualized return.
PAFGX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- YTD
- -2.27%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 10.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.17%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
PRWCX
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -4.88%
- YTD
- -5.03%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 14.87%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAFGX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAFGX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PAFGX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank
PAFGX
PRWCX
PAFGX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAFGX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 2.11 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.93 | -0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 8.23 | -2.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAFGX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | 0.68 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.87 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.90 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAFGX and PRWCX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PAFGX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison
PAFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.90%, less than PRWCX's 16.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAFGX T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund | 6.90% | 6.75% | 5.00% | 2.32% | 2.74% | 7.14% | 0.79% | 2.92% | 2.26% | 0.75% | 0.36% | 1.62% |
PRWCX T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund | 16.55% | 15.72% | 10.38% | 4.15% | 9.44% | 9.23% | 7.97% | 5.83% | 7.46% | 6.82% | 3.51% | 9.86% |
Drawdowns
PAFGX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAFGX drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAFGX and PRWCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAFGX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.45% | -41.77% | +17.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.71% | -6.80% | -0.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.00% | -17.07% | -4.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.45% | -26.86% | +2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -6.27% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.83% | -3.34% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 1.66% | +0.11% |
Volatility
PAFGX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 2.94%. This indicates that PAFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAFGX | PRWCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.37% | 2.94% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.81% | 9.61% | -3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.83% | 13.47% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.39% | 13.21% | -3.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.19% | 12.97% | -2.78% |