PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PAFGX vs. PDSYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PAFGX vs. PDSYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) and Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAFGX achieves a 7.05% return, which is significantly higher than PDSYX's 4.81% return.


PAFGX

1D
0.00%
1M
2.04%
YTD
7.05%
6M
8.26%
1Y
17.59%
3Y*
13.03%
5Y*
5.66%
10Y*
7.90%

PDSYX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
4.81%
6M
4.78%
1Y
9.17%
3Y*
6.04%
5Y*
3.61%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAFGX vs. PDSYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PAFGX
T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund
7.05%14.75%9.43%13.48%-14.80%8.83%14.45%5.89%
PDSYX
Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund
4.81%7.90%3.65%2.45%-5.36%14.81%2.43%4.08%

Correlation

The correlation between PAFGX and PDSYX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2019

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between PAFGX and PDSYX has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PAFGX vs. PDSYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAFGX
PAFGX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PAFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
PAFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

PDSYX
PDSYX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PDSYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDSYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDSYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PDSYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDSYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAFGX vs. PDSYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) and Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PAFGXPDSYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

3.16

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

4.99

-1.67

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.65

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

4.84

-2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.53

21.30

-9.77

PAFGX vs. PDSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the PDSYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAFGX and PDSYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PAFGXPDSYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

3.16

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.57

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.57

+0.17

Drawdowns

PAFGX vs. PDSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAFGX drawdown since its inception was -24.45%, smaller than the maximum PDSYX drawdown of -30.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAFGX and PDSYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PAFGXPDSYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.45%

-30.01%

+5.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.79%

-1.98%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.63%

-5.84%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.00%

-10.95%

-11.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.59%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.79%

-4.36%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.56%

0.45%

+1.11%

Volatility

PAFGX vs. PDSYX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund (PAFGX) has a higher volatility of 2.45% compared to Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund (PDSYX) at 0.91%. This indicates that PAFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PAFGXPDSYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.45%

0.91%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.37%

2.39%

+3.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.75%

2.98%

+4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.47%

6.33%

+3.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.24%

8.72%

+1.52%

PAFGX vs. PDSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAFGX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than PDSYX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PAFGX vs. PDSYX - Dividend Comparison

PAFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, more than PDSYX's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAFGX
T. Rowe Price Global Allocation Fund
6.30%6.75%5.00%2.32%2.74%7.14%0.79%2.92%2.26%0.75%0.36%1.62%
PDSYX
Principal Diversified Select Real Asset Fund
1.77%1.85%2.18%2.06%1.58%7.46%2.70%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PAFGX and PDSYX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PAFGX has higher volatility (2.45%) compared to PDSYX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAFGX dropped -24.45% vs PDSYX's -30.01%.

PDSYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PAFGX and PDSYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer