PAELX vs. EDD

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

PAELX (T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund) and EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PAELX returned 2.18%/yr vs 6.01%/yr for EDD. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAELX charges 1.10%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EDD.

Performance

PAELX vs. EDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (PAELX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PAELX achieves a 0.40% return, which is significantly lower than EDD's 14.80% return. Over the past 10 years, PAELX has underperformed EDD with an annualized return of 2.18%, while EDD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.01% annualized return.

PAELX

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -0.45%
• 6M: 0.40%
• YTD: 0.40%
• 1Y: 6.38%
• 3Y*: 5.90%
• 5Y*: 1.35%
• 10Y*: 2.18%

EDD

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: 11.02%
• 6M: 14.80%
• YTD: 14.80%
• 1Y: 24.46%
• 3Y*: 19.21%
• 5Y*: 8.50%
• 10Y*: 6.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PAELX vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PAELX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	0.40%	19.02%	-4.90%	14.00%	-12.54%	-9.77%	3.80%	13.03%	-7.73%	15.33%
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	14.80%	32.46%	8.64%	14.09%	-14.15%	-7.03%	-2.84%	25.45%	-14.09%	16.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PAELX and EDD is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2011	0.53

The correlation between PAELX and EDD shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PAELX vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PAELX

PAELX Risk / Return Rank: 17
PAELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
PAELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
PAELX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
PAELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
PAELX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

EDD

EDD Risk / Return Rank: 32
EDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
EDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
EDD Omega Ratio Rank: 38
EDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
EDD Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PAELX vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (PAELX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PAELX	EDD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.92	1.47	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	2.07	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.27	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.93	1.39	-0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.75	4.46	-1.70

PAELX vs. EDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PAELX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the EDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PAELX and EDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PAELX vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PAELX drawdown since its inception was -34.71%, smaller than the maximum EDD drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAELX and EDD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PAELX	EDD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-59.38%	+24.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.70%	-17.67%	+10.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.77%	-17.67%	+8.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.15%	-32.04%	+5.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.32%	-42.70%	+13.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-1.02%	-2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.92%	-24.15%	+9.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.25%	5.52%	-3.27%

Volatility

PAELX vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund (PAELX) is 2.15%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that PAELX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PAELX	EDD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.15%	5.23%	-3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.99%	13.63%	-7.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.76%	16.69%	-9.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.84%	15.48%	-7.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.60%	17.64%	-9.04%

PAELX vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PAELX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PAELX vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison

PAELX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.61%, less than EDD's 10.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund	10.82%	9.76%	11.45%	7.30%	6.82%	6.93%	6.92%	8.15%	9.90%	8.18%	10.32%	12.65%
PAELX T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Local Currency Bond Fund	5.61%	5.70%	5.71%	5.06%	4.25%	4.71%	4.03%	5.19%	5.91%	5.40%	5.46%	5.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PAELX and EDD in my portfolio?

PAELX and EDD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PAELX or EDD?

EDD has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to PAELX (2.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAELX dropped -34.71% vs EDD's -59.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.