PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PADZX vs. PBHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PADZX vs. PBHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX) and PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PADZX achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than PBHAX's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PADZX has underperformed PBHAX with an annualized return of 4.32%, while PBHAX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.22% annualized return.


PADZX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.50%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.78%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
6.49%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*
4.32%

PBHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.69%
6M
2.17%
1Y
7.37%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PADZX vs. PBHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PADZX
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund
2.29%5.10%7.48%6.11%-1.55%1.87%0.59%11.10%0.71%6.67%
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
1.69%8.79%6.89%10.75%-12.51%5.63%4.87%15.86%-1.53%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PADZX and PBHAX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2011

0.46

The correlation between PADZX and PBHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (5 years) to 0.46 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PADZX vs. PBHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PADZX
PADZX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
PADZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADZX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PADZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

PBHAX
PBHAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PBHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PBHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
PBHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PBHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
PBHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PADZX vs. PBHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX) and PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PADZXPBHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.86

1.54

+1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.71

3.08

+4.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

40.05

15.43

+24.61

PADZX vs. PBHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PADZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the PBHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PADZX and PBHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PADZXPBHAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.15

+0.64

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.85

0.66

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.37

0.95

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

1.35

-0.14

Drawdowns

PADZX vs. PBHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PADZX drawdown since its inception was -17.99%, smaller than the maximum PBHAX drawdown of -28.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PADZX and PBHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PADZXPBHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.99%

-28.80%

+10.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.76%

-2.48%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.98%

-4.06%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-4.05%

-16.22%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.99%

-21.14%

+3.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

0.00%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-2.87%

+1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.15%

0.49%

-0.34%

Volatility

PADZX vs. PBHAX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund (PADZX) has a higher volatility of 1.42% compared to PGIM High Yield Fund (PBHAX) at 1.16%. This indicates that PADZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PADZXPBHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

1.16%

+0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.77%

2.71%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10%

3.56%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.16%

5.06%

-2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.16%

5.49%

-2.33%

PADZX vs. PBHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PADZX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than PBHAX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

PADZX vs. PBHAX - Dividend Comparison

PADZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.08%, less than PBHAX's 6.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PADZX
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund
5.08%5.07%5.18%4.09%2.89%2.40%3.41%10.79%5.02%2.75%2.36%2.38%
PBHAX
PGIM High Yield Fund
6.73%6.71%6.01%5.73%5.94%5.88%5.70%5.96%6.26%5.98%4.61%6.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PADZX and PBHAX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PADZX has higher volatility (1.42%) compared to PBHAX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PADZX dropped -17.99% vs PBHAX's -28.80%.

PADZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PADZX and PBHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer