PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PACJX vs. PTDIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PACJX vs. PTDIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PACJX achieves a 11.16% return, which is significantly higher than PTDIX's 7.80% return.


PACJX

1D
0.35%
1M
4.82%
YTD
11.16%
6M
12.06%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
21.74%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

PTDIX

1D
0.34%
1M
3.88%
YTD
7.80%
6M
8.09%
1Y
19.26%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
8.31%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PACJX vs. PTDIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PACJX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund
11.16%19.51%15.39%30.61%-17.58%19.58%15.82%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
7.80%15.59%17.43%18.33%-18.13%15.35%15.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PACJX and PTDIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.96

The correlation between PACJX and PTDIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PACJX vs. PTDIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PACJX
PACJX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PACJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PACJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PACJX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PACJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PACJX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PTDIX
PTDIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PTDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
PTDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PACJX vs. PTDIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PACJXPTDIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.37

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.68

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.45

11.94

+3.51

PACJX vs. PTDIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PACJX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the PTDIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PACJX and PTDIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PACJXPTDIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

2.00

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.62

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.48

+0.29

Drawdowns

PACJX vs. PTDIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PACJX drawdown since its inception was -32.14%, smaller than the maximum PTDIX drawdown of -54.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PACJX and PTDIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PACJXPTDIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.14%

-54.38%

+22.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.03%

-7.32%

-0.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.69%

-13.05%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-25.43%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-7.49%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

1.64%

+0.12%

Volatility

PACJX vs. PTDIX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund (PACJX) and Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund (PTDIX) have volatilities of 2.93% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PACJXPTDIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

2.89%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.45%

7.85%

+0.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

9.81%

+1.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

13.49%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.91%

13.83%

+4.08%

PACJX vs. PTDIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PACJX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than PTDIX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PACJX vs. PTDIX - Dividend Comparison

PACJX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, less than PTDIX's 9.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PACJX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2055 Fund
8.95%9.94%6.26%4.56%9.65%17.43%1.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PTDIX
Principal LifeTime 2040 Fund
9.09%9.80%12.28%4.40%8.61%8.92%6.01%7.26%9.28%6.07%4.86%6.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PACJX and PTDIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PACJX has higher volatility (2.93%) compared to PTDIX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PACJX dropped -32.14% vs PTDIX's -54.38%.

PACJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PACJX and PTDIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer