PAC vs. LEGR
PAC (Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.) is a stock, while LEGR (First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF) is Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Blockchain Index. Over the past 5 years, PAC returned 19.36%/yr vs 11.69%/yr for LEGR. Their 0.41 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PAC vs. LEGR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC achieves a -17.26% return, which is significantly lower than LEGR's 12.04% return.
PAC
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -14.02%
- 6M
- -21.32%
- YTD
- -17.26%
- 1Y
- -2.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.07%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.14%
LEGR
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 6.52%
- YTD
- 12.04%
- 1Y
- 27.59%
- 3Y*
- 22.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $160.83K | $125.02K | $170.72K | |
| $39.17M | $35.29M | $29.07M |
PAC vs. LEGR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. | -17.26% | 56.30% | 4.19% | 28.64% | 9.79% | 29.95% | -6.17% | 54.36% | -20.41% |
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 12.04% | 30.83% | 16.25% | 22.79% | -19.01% | 17.91% | 18.73% | 27.99% | -14.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC and LEGR is 0.32, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2018 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC vs. LEGR — Risk / Return Rank
PAC
LEGR
PAC vs. LEGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) and First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PAC | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.33 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.10 | 2.67 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.19 | 8.73 | -8.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PAC vs. LEGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC drawdown since its inception was -73.20%, which is greater than LEGR's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC and LEGR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.20% | -36.12% | -37.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.28% | -10.40% | -17.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.83% | -14.25% | -28.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.83% | -31.45% | -11.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.39% | -1.80% | -25.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.56% | -6.56% | -10.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.73% | 3.17% | +11.56% |
Volatility
PAC vs. LEGR - Volatility Comparison
Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. (PAC) has a higher volatility of 8.11% compared to First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF (LEGR) at 4.44%. This indicates that PAC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LEGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC | LEGR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.11% | 4.44% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.89% | 12.50% | +13.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.72% | 14.77% | +16.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.24% | 17.08% | +19.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.53% | 20.26% | +18.27% |
Dividends
PAC vs. LEGR - Dividend Comparison
PAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, more than LEGR's 1.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LEGR First Trust Indxx Innovative Transaction & Process ETF | 1.78% | 1.84% | 2.40% | 2.56% | 2.64% | 1.80% | 0.95% | 2.04% | 1.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PAC Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V. | 2.05% | 3.33% | 4.14% | 4.88% | 5.02% | 4.17% | 0.00% | 4.99% | 6.27% | 5.83% | 4.50% | 3.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAC and LEGR have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PAC has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to LEGR (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PAC dropped -73.20% vs LEGR's -36.12%.
LEGR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs -0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PAC and LEGR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer