PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE
PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and ZPRA.DE (SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE while ZPRA.DE tracks the S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAC.DE returned 5.97%/yr vs 5.15%/yr for ZPRA.DE. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAC.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ZPRA.DE.
Performance
PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than ZPRA.DE's 4.42% return.
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
ZPRA.DE
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 10.80%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 5.15%
- 10Y*
- 6.59%
PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
ZPRA.DE SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.42% | 9.80% | 11.25% | 11.54% | -10.70% | 12.81% | -9.50% | 24.48% | -4.62% | 13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC.DE and ZPRA.DE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between PAC.DE and ZPRA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PAC.DE
ZPRA.DE
PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAC.DE | ZPRA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 1.93 | +0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 5.05 | +0.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAC.DE | ZPRA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.39 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than ZPRA.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and ZPRA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC.DE | ZPRA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -31.54% | -5.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -5.57% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.21% | -13.55% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.21% | -21.66% | +1.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -2.76% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -6.47% | +1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.13% | +0.12% |
Volatility
PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (ZPRA.DE) at 2.71%. This indicates that PAC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZPRA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC.DE | ZPRA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 2.71% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 7.42% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 9.67% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 12.92% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 14.47% | +2.05% |
PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPRA.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAC.DE vs. ZPRA.DE - Dividend Comparison
PAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZPRA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZPRA.DE SPDR S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) | 2.87% | 3.01% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 3.64% | 4.00% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.41% | 1.78% | 2.25% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAC.DE and ZPRA.DE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.
PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while ZPRA.DE tracks S&P Pan Asia Dividend Aristocrats. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for PAC.DE and 0.55% for ZPRA.DE.
Find the right allocation for PAC.DE and ZPRA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer