PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE
PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and LGQK.DE (Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE while LGQK.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAC.DE returned 5.97%/yr vs 5.53%/yr for LGQK.DE. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PAC.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LGQK.DE.
Performance
PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than LGQK.DE's 9.03% return.
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
LGQK.DE
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 9.03%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 13.89%
- 3Y*
- 10.11%
- 5Y*
- 5.53%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 9.03% | 6.49% | 12.16% | 1.67% | -1.07% | 12.33% | 56.18% | 16.88% | -9.04% | 10.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC.DE and LGQK.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.96 |
The correlation between PAC.DE and LGQK.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PAC.DE
LGQK.DE
PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAC.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.20 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 2.21 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 6.30 | -0.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAC.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 1.14 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.37 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.55 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, roughly equal to the maximum LGQK.DE drawdown of -36.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and LGQK.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -36.96% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -6.26% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.21% | -20.04% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.21% | -20.04% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -2.16% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -6.18% | +1.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.20% | +0.05% |
Volatility
PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist (LGQK.DE) have volatilities of 3.19% and 3.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC.DE | LGQK.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 3.20% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 9.32% | -0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 12.16% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 14.67% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 25.08% | -8.56% |
PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than LGQK.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PAC.DE vs. LGQK.DE - Dividend Comparison
PAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LGQK.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LGQK.DE Amundi MSCI Pacific Ex Japan UCITS ETF Dist | 2.64% | 2.88% | 5.33% | 3.78% | 4.41% | 3.15% | 0.89% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, PAC.DE and LGQK.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LGQK.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LGQK.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for PAC.DE.
PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while LGQK.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for PAC.DE and 0.12% for LGQK.DE.
Find the right allocation for PAC.DE and LGQK.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer