PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE
PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and IQQX.DE (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE while IQQX.DE tracks the Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAC.DE returned 5.97%/yr vs 10.09%/yr for IQQX.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PAC.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IQQX.DE.
Performance
PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than IQQX.DE's 13.33% return.
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQX.DE
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- 0.04%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 13.82%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 13.33% | 14.78% | 12.48% | 8.98% | 2.81% | 11.77% | -18.85% | 16.80% | -11.26% | 2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC.DE and IQQX.DE is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PAC.DE and IQQX.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PAC.DE
IQQX.DE
PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAC.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.57 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 5.55 | -3.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 20.94 | -15.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAC.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 3.10 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.77 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.21 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, smaller than the maximum IQQX.DE drawdown of -69.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and IQQX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -69.45% | +32.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -6.18% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.21% | -20.28% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.21% | -20.28% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -2.62% | +0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -14.55% | +9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 1.64% | +0.61% |
Volatility
PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF (IQQX.DE) at 2.93%. This indicates that PAC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC.DE | IQQX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 2.93% | +0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 8.61% | +0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 11.06% | +0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 13.01% | +1.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 15.75% | +0.77% |
PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQX.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
PAC.DE vs. IQQX.DE - Dividend Comparison
PAC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQX.DE iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS ETF | 3.12% | 3.64% | 4.84% | 5.36% | 6.66% | 4.62% | 3.16% | 4.85% | 5.09% | 4.16% | 4.03% | 4.88% |
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PAC.DE and IQQX.DE have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IQQX.DE.
PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while IQQX.DE tracks Dow Jones Asia/Pacific Select Dividend 50. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for PAC.DE and 0.59% for IQQX.DE.
Find the right allocation for PAC.DE and IQQX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer