PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE
PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and FLXT.DE (Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - PAC.DE tracks the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE while FLXT.DE tracks the FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PAC.DE returned 9.63%/yr vs 41.09%/yr for FLXT.DE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PAC.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLXT.DE.
Performance
PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly lower than FLXT.DE's 69.39% return.
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
FLXT.DE
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- 15.06%
- YTD
- 69.39%
- 6M
- 74.66%
- 1Y
- 115.04%
- 3Y*
- 41.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | -4.08% |
FLXT.DE Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation | 69.39% | 19.89% | 30.42% | 25.56% | -22.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC.DE and FLXT.DE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2022 | 0.56 |
The correlation between PAC.DE and FLXT.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PAC.DE
FLXT.DE
PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAC.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.78 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 12.64 | -10.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 38.64 | -33.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAC.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 4.92 | -3.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.15 | -0.72 |
Drawdowns
PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than FLXT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and FLXT.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -31.16% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -9.05% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.21% | -31.16% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -1.86% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -8.18% | +3.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 2.97% | -0.72% |
Volatility
PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) is 3.19%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) has a volatility of 9.61%. This indicates that PAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC.DE | FLXT.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 9.61% | -6.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 18.65% | -9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 23.26% | -11.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 21.86% | -7.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 21.86% | -5.34% |
PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PAC.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAC.DE nor FLXT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAC.DE and FLXT.DE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PAC.DE is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PAC.DE is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for FLXT.DE.
PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while FLXT.DE tracks FTSE Taiwan 30/18 Capped. They also come from different issuers: BNP Paribas and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for PAC.DE and 0.19% for FLXT.DE.
Find the right allocation for PAC.DE and FLXT.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer