PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE).
PAC.DE and ETDD.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PAC.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE. It was launched on Feb 19, 2016. ETDD.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX® 50. It was launched on Jul 27, 2015. Both PAC.DE and ETDD.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 5.95% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 12.85% | -2.66% | 21.45% | -6.04% | 10.46% |
ETDD.DE BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | -1.53% | 22.10% | 10.81% | 22.48% | -8.67% | 23.67% | -2.97% | 29.87% | -12.20% | 9.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 5.95% return, which is significantly higher than ETDD.DE's -1.53% return.
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 5.95%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 15.79%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.18%
- 10Y*
- —
ETDD.DE
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.22%
- YTD
- -1.53%
- 6M
- 1.27%
- 1Y
- 10.38%
- 3Y*
- 12.82%
- 5Y*
- 10.70%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than ETDD.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PAC.DE
ETDD.DE
PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAC.DE | ETDD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 0.60 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 0.91 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.12 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 1.33 | +1.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.24 | 4.91 | +4.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAC.DE | ETDD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 0.60 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.61 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.38 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC.DE and ETDD.DE is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAC.DE nor ETDD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, roughly equal to the maximum ETDD.DE drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and ETDD.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC.DE | ETDD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -38.45% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.86% | -10.95% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.21% | -23.26% | +3.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -7.68% | +3.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -7.22% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.96% | -0.84% |
Volatility
PAC.DE vs. ETDD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) is 4.70%, while BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) has a volatility of 6.28%. This indicates that PAC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETDD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PAC.DE | ETDD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 6.28% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 10.94% | -2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 17.35% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 17.28% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 18.26% | -1.70% |