ETDD.DE vs. EXS1.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) and iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE).
ETDD.DE and EXS1.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ETDD.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the EURO STOXX® 50. It was launched on Jul 27, 2015. EXS1.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the DAX®. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000. Both ETDD.DE and EXS1.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ETDD.DE or EXS1.DE.
Correlation
The correlation between ETDD.DE and EXS1.DE is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
ETDD.DE vs. EXS1.DE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ETDD.DE:
1.32
EXS1.DE:
2.41
ETDD.DE:
1.88
EXS1.DE:
3.23
ETDD.DE:
1.23
EXS1.DE:
1.41
ETDD.DE:
1.84
EXS1.DE:
3.62
ETDD.DE:
5.64
EXS1.DE:
13.01
ETDD.DE:
3.22%
EXS1.DE:
2.30%
ETDD.DE:
13.73%
EXS1.DE:
12.44%
ETDD.DE:
-38.45%
EXS1.DE:
-60.30%
ETDD.DE:
0.00%
EXS1.DE:
0.00%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ETDD.DE having a 10.68% return and EXS1.DE slightly higher at 10.80%. Over the past 10 years, ETDD.DE has outperformed EXS1.DE with an annualized return of 10.98%, while EXS1.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.51% annualized return.
ETDD.DE
10.68%
3.62%
10.51%
14.10%
11.15%
10.98%
EXS1.DE
10.80%
3.68%
18.21%
26.23%
9.51%
6.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ETDD.DE vs. EXS1.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ETDD.DE has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than EXS1.DE's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ETDD.DE vs. EXS1.DE — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ETDD.DE
EXS1.DE
ETDD.DE vs. EXS1.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) and iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ETDD.DE vs. EXS1.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither ETDD.DE nor EXS1.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETDD.DE BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EXS1.DE iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 0.48% | 0.73% | 0.66% | 0.60% |
Drawdowns
ETDD.DE vs. EXS1.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ETDD.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, smaller than the maximum EXS1.DE drawdown of -60.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETDD.DE and EXS1.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ETDD.DE vs. EXS1.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (ETDD.DE) and iShares Core DAX UCITS ETF (DE) (EXS1.DE) have volatilities of 3.86% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.