PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DBX8.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C
28.25%77.39%-18.45%15.93%-17.49%
FLXT.DE
Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation
13.53%19.89%30.42%25.56%-22.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBX8.DE achieves a 28.25% return, which is significantly higher than FLXT.DE's 13.53% return.


DBX8.DE

1D
-3.73%
1M
-5.48%
YTD
28.25%
6M
54.87%
1Y
120.27%
3Y*
27.16%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
11.30%

FLXT.DE

1D
-1.72%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
13.53%
6M
20.34%
1Y
52.94%
3Y*
25.86%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBX8.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXT.DE's 0.19% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBX8.DE
DBX8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
DBX8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBX8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBX8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DBX8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBX8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXT.DE
FLXT.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FLXT.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXT.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBX8.DEFLXT.DEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.04

1.94

+1.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.66

2.53

+1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.36

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.07

6.07

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.21

19.96

-0.75

DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBX8.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is higher than the FLXT.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBX8.DE and FLXT.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBX8.DEFLXT.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

1.94

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.68

-0.46

Correlation

The correlation between DBX8.DE and FLXT.DE is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither DBX8.DE nor FLXT.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBX8.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.01%, which is greater than FLXT.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX8.DE and FLXT.DE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


DBX8.DEFLXT.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.01%

-31.16%

-36.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.19%

-14.59%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.90%

-7.17%

-9.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.68%

-8.48%

-9.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.70%

3.12%

+3.58%

Volatility

DBX8.DE vs. FLXT.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI Korea UCITS ETF 1C (DBX8.DE) has a higher volatility of 17.06% compared to Franklin FTSE Taiwan UCITS ETF USD Capitalisation (FLXT.DE) at 8.03%. This indicates that DBX8.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXT.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


DBX8.DEFLXT.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.06%

8.03%

+9.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.26%

16.66%

+18.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.32%

27.09%

+12.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.69%

21.29%

+4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

21.29%

+3.77%