PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE
PAC.DE (BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF) and ASRE.DE (BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG 3-5Y UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PAC.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while ASRE.DE is a European Government Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan ESG EMU Government Bond IG 3-5 Year. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PAC.DE returned 5.97%/yr vs -0.36%/yr for ASRE.DE. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PAC.DE charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ASRE.DE.
Performance
PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PAC.DE achieves a 8.00% return, which is significantly higher than ASRE.DE's -0.12% return.
PAC.DE
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 8.00%
- 6M
- 9.57%
- 1Y
- 12.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- —
ASRE.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- -0.12%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 0.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.70%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- —
PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAC.DE BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF | 8.00% | 6.73% | 12.07% | 2.38% | 0.50% | 4.74% |
ASRE.DE BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG 3-5Y UCITS ETF | -0.12% | 2.42% | 2.13% | 5.11% | -9.94% | -0.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PAC.DE and ASRE.DE is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2021 | 0.13 |
The correlation between PAC.DE and ASRE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (5 years) to 0.31 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PAC.DE
ASRE.DE
PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG 3-5Y UCITS ETF (ASRE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PAC.DE | ASRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.03 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.00 | 0.15 | +1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 0.41 | +5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PAC.DE | ASRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.08 | 0.14 | +0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | -0.10 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | -0.10 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PAC.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.90%, which is greater than ASRE.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PAC.DE and ASRE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PAC.DE | ASRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.90% | -12.01% | -24.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.33% | -2.40% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.21% | -2.40% | -17.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.21% | -12.01% | -8.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.33% | -2.42% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.10% | -5.22% | +0.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.25% | 0.85% | +1.40% |
Volatility
PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE - Volatility Comparison
BNP Paribas Easy MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE UCITS ETF (PAC.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to BNP Paribas Easy JPM ESG EMU Government Bond IG 3-5Y UCITS ETF (ASRE.DE) at 1.03%. This indicates that PAC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASRE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PAC.DE | ASRE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 1.03% | +2.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 2.28% | +6.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.77% | 2.57% | +9.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 3.60% | +10.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 3.52% | +13.00% |
PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PAC.DE has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is higher than ASRE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PAC.DE vs. ASRE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PAC.DE nor ASRE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PAC.DE and ASRE.DE have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ASRE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ASRE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for PAC.DE.
PAC.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while ASRE.DE is European Government Bonds. PAC.DE tracks MSCI Pacific ex Japan ESG Filtered Min TE, while ASRE.DE tracks J.P. Morgan ESG EMU Government Bond IG 3-5 Year. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for PAC.DE and 0.15% for ASRE.DE.
Find the right allocation for PAC.DE and ASRE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer