PABU vs. BUFH
PABU (iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PABU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD), while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PABU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
PABU vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PABU achieves a 9.39% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
PABU
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 7.47%
- YTD
- 9.39%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PABU vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF | 9.39% | 11.11% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PABU and BUFH is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PABU vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
PABU
BUFH
PABU vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PABU | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PABU | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 2.91 | -2.18 |
Drawdowns
PABU vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PABU drawdown since its inception was -22.76%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABU and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PABU | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.76% | -1.53% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -0.05% | -1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.63% | -0.18% | -5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | — | — |
Volatility
PABU vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PABU | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.37% | 2.37% | +11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 2.37% | +16.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.68% | 2.37% | +16.31% |
PABU vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PABU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PABU vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
PABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF | 0.86% | 0.90% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PABU and BUFH have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PABU is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PABU is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
PABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
PABU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PABU and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for PABU and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer