PABU vs. BBUS
PABU (iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - PABU tracks the MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD) while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PABU returned 16.87%/yr vs 20.74%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PABU charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
PABU vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PABU achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 7.68% return.
PABU
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -4.12%
- YTD
- 2.20%
- 6M
- 0.95%
- 1Y
- 13.45%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- 1Y
- 21.54%
- 3Y*
- 20.74%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
PABU vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF | 2.20% | 13.08% | 24.84% | 29.51% | -15.45% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 7.68% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -14.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PABU and BBUS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between PABU and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
PABU vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PABU
BBUS
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
PABU
BBUS
Real Estate
PABU
BBUS
Communication Services
PABU
BBUS
Financial Services
PABU
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
PABU
BBUS
Healthcare
PABU
BBUS
Utilities
PABU
BBUS
Industrials
PABU
BBUS
Energy
PABU
BBUS
Basic Materials
PABU
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
PABU
-
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PABU vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
PABU
BBUS
PABU vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PABU | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.31 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 2.35 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 10.33 | -6.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PABU vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PABU drawdown since its inception was -22.76%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABU and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PABU | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.76% | -35.35% | +12.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.40% | -9.21% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.85% | -19.01% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.77% | -3.37% | -4.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.62% | -5.43% | -0.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.02% | 2.09% | +1.93% |
Volatility
PABU vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF (PABU) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 4.89%. This indicates that PABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PABU | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 4.89% | +1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 9.87% | +1.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.20% | 12.53% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 17.13% | +1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 19.59% | -0.83% |
PABU vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PABU has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PABU vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
PABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, less than BBUS's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.03% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
PABU iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF | 0.95% | 0.90% | 1.00% | 1.06% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, PABU and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
PABU has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to BBUS (4.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PABU dropped -22.76% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 3-year performance, BBUS leads with 20.74% vs 16.87% for PABU. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 20.74% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for PABU.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.95% for PABU.
PABU tracks MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned Benchmark Extended Select PAB Index (USD), while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for PABU and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PABU and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer