PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PABG.L vs. FLXD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PABG.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PABG.L achieves a 5.89% return, which is significantly lower than FLXD.L's 9.29% return.


PABG.L

1D
0.86%
1M
3.40%
YTD
5.89%
6M
6.95%
1Y
16.55%
3Y*
16.35%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*

FLXD.L

1D
0.49%
1M
-0.47%
YTD
9.29%
6M
12.75%
1Y
20.23%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
13.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PABG.L
Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
5.89%27.75%9.01%19.40%-11.91%18.30%
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
9.29%31.50%8.51%9.23%6.26%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between PABG.L and FLXD.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2021

0.63

The correlation between PABG.L and FLXD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.63 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PABG.L
FLXD.L

Financial Services

32.6%
35.8%

Technology

19.8%
0.7%

Industrials

16.1%
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
1.0%

Healthcare

8.2%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.6%

Utilities

4.1%
3.1%

Communication Services

3.5%
16.3%

Real Estate

1.1%
3.5%

Basic Materials

0.4%
5.2%

Energy

0.2%
11.6%

Financial Services

PABG.L
32.6%
FLXD.L
35.8%

Technology

PABG.L
19.8%
FLXD.L
0.7%

Industrials

PABG.L
16.1%
FLXD.L
7.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PABG.L
9.9%
FLXD.L
1.0%

Healthcare

PABG.L
8.2%
FLXD.L
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

PABG.L
4.2%
FLXD.L
4.6%

Utilities

PABG.L
4.1%
FLXD.L
3.1%

Communication Services

PABG.L
3.5%
FLXD.L
16.3%

Real Estate

PABG.L
1.1%
FLXD.L
3.5%

Basic Materials

PABG.L
0.4%
FLXD.L
5.2%

Energy

PABG.L
0.2%
FLXD.L
11.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PABG.L
PABG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PABG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PABG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
PABG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
PABG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PABG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FLXD.L
FLXD.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLXD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PABG.L) and Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PABG.LFLXD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

5.64

-4.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.90

15.75

-10.85

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PABG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the FLXD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PABG.L and FLXD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PABG.LFLXD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.40

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

1.21

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.64

+0.08

Drawdowns

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PABG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.49%, smaller than the maximum FLXD.L drawdown of -29.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABG.L and FLXD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PABG.LFLXD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.49%

-29.71%

+3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.78%

-3.62%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-7.78%

-6.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.49%

-11.76%

-14.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.04%

-2.77%

+2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-4.13%

-1.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.30%

+2.15%

Volatility

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PABG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF (FLXD.L) at 2.67%. This indicates that PABG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLXD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PABG.LFLXD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.81%

2.67%

+2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

6.95%

+5.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.38%

8.52%

+6.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

10.85%

+6.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.73%

12.91%

+3.82%

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PABG.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FLXD.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PABG.L vs. FLXD.L - Dividend Comparison

PABG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLXD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FLXD.L
Franklin European Quality Dividend UCITS ETF
4.37%4.90%5.18%5.75%5.87%5.51%3.90%1.53%1.09%
PABG.L
Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PABG.L and FLXD.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PABG.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PABG.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FLXD.L.

PABG.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while FLXD.L tracks MSCI Europe High Div Yld NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PABG.L and 0.25% for FLXD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PABG.L and FLXD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer