PABG.L vs. ZPAB.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PABG.L) and Amundi S&P Eurozone PAB Net Zero Ambition UCITS ETF Acc (ZPAB.DE).
PABG.L and ZPAB.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PABG.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI EMU NR EUR. It was launched on Jul 6, 2020. ZPAB.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the S&P Eurozone LargeMidCap Paris-Aligned Climate. It was launched on Jul 6, 2020. Both PABG.L and ZPAB.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PABG.L or ZPAB.DE.
Key characteristics
| PABG.L | ZPAB.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.47% | 12.45% |
| 1Y Return | 16.58% | 22.19% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.77% | 3.74% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.25 | 1.76 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.79 | 2.49 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.21 | 1.30 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.89 | 2.53 |
| Martin Ratio | 5.67 | 9.62 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.66% | 2.21% |
| Daily Std Dev | 12.13% | 12.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.49% | -28.70% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.20% | -3.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PABG.L and ZPAB.DE is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
PABG.L vs. ZPAB.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, PABG.L achieves a 7.47% return, which is significantly lower than ZPAB.DE's 12.45% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PABG.L vs. ZPAB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PABG.L and ZPAB.DE have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PABG.L vs. ZPAB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PABG.L) and Amundi S&P Eurozone PAB Net Zero Ambition UCITS ETF Acc (ZPAB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PABG.L vs. ZPAB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PABG.L nor ZPAB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
PABG.L vs. ZPAB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PABG.L drawdown since its inception was -26.49%, smaller than the maximum ZPAB.DE drawdown of -28.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABG.L and ZPAB.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PABG.L vs. ZPAB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Net Zero 2050 S&P Eurozone Climate PAB (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (PABG.L) and Amundi S&P Eurozone PAB Net Zero Ambition UCITS ETF Acc (ZPAB.DE) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.