PABFX vs. FRGAX
PABFX (PGIM Balanced Fund) and FRGAX (Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, PABFX returned 15.58%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for FRGAX. Their 0.97 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. PABFX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for FRGAX.
Performance
PABFX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PABFX achieves a 6.50% return, which is significantly lower than FRGAX's 7.61% return.
PABFX
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 6.50%
- 1Y
- 15.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.58%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 9.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.85%
FRGAX
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- 6M
- 5.42%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 1Y
- 16.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
PABFX PGIM Balanced Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
PABFX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PABFX PGIM Balanced Fund | 6.50% | 15.83% | 19.80% | 17.08% | -0.83% |
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 7.61% | 17.10% | 12.91% | 17.57% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between PABFX and FRGAX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between PABFX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PABFX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank
PABFX
FRGAX
PABFX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PABFX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.29 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.23 | 2.21 | +0.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 9.26 | +0.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PABFX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PABFX drawdown since its inception was -40.90%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PABFX and FRGAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PABFX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.90% | -11.77% | -29.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.74% | -7.03% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | -11.77% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.24% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -1.61% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.76% | -1.57% | -3.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 1.67% | -0.11% |
Volatility
PABFX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Balanced Fund (PABFX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PABFX | FRGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.67% | 2.74% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.65% | 8.17% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.19% | 9.88% | -0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.06% | 10.38% | +1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.63% | 10.38% | +1.25% |
PABFX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PABFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
PABFX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison
PABFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.99%, more than FRGAX's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRGAX Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund | 1.86% | 2.00% | 2.01% | 1.77% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PABFX PGIM Balanced Fund | 8.99% | 9.57% | 13.25% | 2.35% | 2.09% | 12.40% | 1.66% | 5.18% | 7.55% | 5.78% | 4.79% | 8.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, PABFX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FRGAX has higher volatility (2.74%) compared to PABFX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PABFX dropped -40.90% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.
PABFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PABFX and FRGAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer